3 ms·
As if better diesel generator placement alone would have substantially prevented the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster...
by pengaru 4y ago
As if better diesel generator placement alone would have substantially prevented the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster...
- dekhn 4y agoActually, that's exactly what would have happened. The plant would have shutdown without any major incident/release of radiation/contamination.
- pengaru 4y ago> Actually, that's exactly what would have happened. The plant would have shutdown without any major incident/release of radiation/contamination. Weren't the pumps and cooling/control systems damaged as well?
- dekhn 4y agoNot so far as I can tell from the various reports I've read.
- pengaru 4y ago"Unit 5 was undergoing pressure testing on the day the earthquake occurred. The unit lost all AC power due to flooding of seawater pumps and power panels. As a consequence, lighting and AC-powered instrumentation on the Unit 5 side of the common control room were inoperable; the Unit 5 side of the control room went dark after the batteries for emergency lighting were depleted" (emphasis mine) From: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK253938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK253938/ Which is quite a read in general, and clearly the diesel generators flooding was a major component of the disaster. But there was a lot that went wrong in addition to that, it's a real mess.
- dekhn 4y agoThat's the control room, though. Reactor 5 was offline, but fueled and never exploded. Unit 4 was the big problem.