3 ms·
People will post more generated images that they consider good, than bad, thus improving the dataset.
by Kuinox 4y ago
People will post more generated images that they consider good, than bad, thus improving the dataset.
- sebastianconcpt 4y agoWhat is that "good" you are referring to when the "goodness" notion is being broken by noise in intelligence itself?
- WithinReason 4y agoGood = label corresponds well to data
- sebastianconcpt 4y agoIf you go deep, you'll find that's still an insufficient imprecise and ambiguous definition. You just reframed the question by delegating that judgment to the dependency on "corresponds well" maintaining the ambiguity, vagueness and imprecision.
- WithinReason 4y agoThere is no ambiguity about calling a dog a dog being better than calling a cat a dog.
- Cthulhu_ 4y agoHowever, this has its own issues in terms of bias; what if you really like HR Giger's work, but this label of "good" is made synonymous with "pretty" or "inoffensive"? I wouldn't fully trust human input into these things.