4 ms·
Doesn't imply any task, just a wide variety of tasks. 10 years at most.
by makeee 4y ago
Doesn't imply any task, just a wide variety of tasks. 10 years at most.
- ianceicys 4y agoThen it's NOT generalized. ANY means ANY.
- dymk 4y agoCan you do any task asked of you, which could be asked of a human being? ANY task.
- ianceicys 4y agoI may not be able to ANY task sufficiently well (ex Calculus, Poetry, Emotion), but by the very definition of being a Human I can do *any* Human task.
- dymk 4y agoWith specific training, sure. Why are we holding an AI to a higher standard?
- kmnc 4y agoIf the task is possible… then why not?
- dymk 4y agoWhat if you don't know how to complete the task?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- arkitaip 4y agoBy definition it has to be any task otherwise it wouldn't be general. What tasks wouldn't an AGI be able to perform and still be an AGI?
- dymk 4y agoReliably trick a humans into thinking it's a human. That's it.
- mod 4y agoI believe that's the Turing Test, not necessarily a definition (or requirement) for AGI.
- dymk 4y agoWhere’s AGI defined? I’ve only seen it used in the context of “can pass the Turing test”
- dinosaurdynasty 4y agoAGI isn't really explicitly defined (it wouldn't be a problem if it was) but it's essentially an artificial version of the "general" intelligence that humans have, aka we can do and learn many things we were not programmed or trained by evolution to do
- nomel 4y agoIt sounds like you may be demanding more from AGI that we do of humans. AGI is a mushy concept, not a hard requirement. "Any task" is definitely not required for a low functioning AGI, just as it's not a requirement for a low functioning human, who still easily fits the definition of an intelligent being.
- yeellow 4y agoFor each human being having GI there are many tasks that person won't be able to perform. For example proving math theorems, doing research in physics, writing a poem, etc. Specyfic AGI could have its limitations as well.
- jtwaleson 4y agoMy takeaway from the Lex Fridman interview is of someone that’s machine-like in his approach. AGI suddenly seemed simpler and within reach. Skipping consciousness and qualia. It’s inhumane, but machine-like and effective. Curious what will become of it.
- bsenftner 4y agoI believe AGI is the threshold where generalized artificial comprehension is achieved and the model can understand any task. Once the understanding part is composable the building portion is following the understanding. I'm using understanding rather than model because our models we make today are not these kinds of comprehensions, understandings are more intelligent.