2 ms·

Well, there's tons of conflicting advice out there if that's the case. Top result on DDG links through to this answer: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/ques

by afro88 4y ago

Well, there's tons of conflicting advice out there if that's the case. Top result on DDG links through to this answer: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/5828/where-would-i-give-credit-to-an-mit-licensed-project-in-an-ios-app https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/5828/where-wo... And this was my understanding of how it works for artifacts. You don't have to attribute in the software itself, just the code.

pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
You get it that you're proving the point that comments like those are harmful, right?
- afro88 4y ago
  Well, I wasn't trying to prove or disprove anything. Just seeking clarity. Not sure if you were referring directly to me, but I don't think my comment was harmful. Others may have also been led astray and an exchange like this might be educational for them to read.
  - pwdisswordfish0 4y ago
    The way that "Well, there's tons of conflicting advice out there if that's the case" was situated/employed in the discussion makes it sound like an attempt to say that there are merits on both sides of the argument--that there are conflicting opinions and the argument is as of yet still unresolved. The problem is that the comments you linked to are uninformed and just flat out wrong--bad advice from people who don't know what they're talking about and in no position to be giving advice. (Another example: the comment by samatman above, which should be buried in downvotes but inexplicably is not even in the grey--and I suspect is actually ranked somewhere at >1.) The only prudent thing to do is to clearly bracket it as such, in order to minimize harm.