3 ms·
You should be reading "3 nm" as "3 nm equivalent". It doesn't mean anything is 3nm, it's just the simplest way of expressing transistor density without making p
by WithinReason 4y ago
You should be reading "3 nm" as "3 nm equivalent". It doesn't mean anything is 3nm, it's just the simplest way of expressing transistor density without making people transition to a different measurement they are not used to. I would personally like Tr/μm², but I'm fine with nm too.