4 ms·
The first source I quoted said a "a few hours or days," but I guess that wasn't convenient for you, so you clipped it. The numbers 5 and 10 are means. "A few h
by Calavar 4y ago
The first source I quoted said a "a few hours or days," but I guess that wasn't convenient for you, so you clipped it.
The numbers 5 and 10 are means. "A few hours or days" represents a range. If you look at the first study, there were several participants who never had detectable spike protein, even when they first checked on day 1 after vaccination. So the spike protein cleared in less than a day for a large chunk of people (i.e. "hours").
As for which study I would trust more, the first study (that reported the shorter period had four times the number of patients). But I guess that is also not convenient for your narrative.
- tresqotheq 4y ago>so you clipped it. So what? You did say "few hours", right? I am only pointing out the ambiguity in your claims. >there were several participants who never had detectable spike protein, even when they first checked on day 1 after vaccination. Look that is fine. But saying "hours or days" is as good as saying we don't have a clue how long the thing lasts in the body. Because, we know that the spike protien itself has toxic effects. Also I see that you ignored the bit about CDC modifying the statement about this. Not convenient for your narrative?