4 ms·
> I’d need to operate administrative files (customer records, contracts, accounting) on a separate machine from dev You're saying that like it is a bad thing?
by wila 4y ago
> I’d need to operate administrative files (customer records, contracts, accounting) on a separate machine from dev
You're saying that like it is a bad thing?
A developer probably shouldn't have access to all that live data anyways.
- eastbound 4y agoAs a founder-developer of a company of 3, would you expect me to have 2 computers, for the security of customer data? It’s an interesting idea, I’m just asking.
- skrtskrt 4y agoFor such a small company I would probably expect that data like that would probably just live in a cloud service like GSuite that’s already SOC2 compliant, then if you’re running software integrations against that data, you’re spinning up isolated SOC2-compliant cloud servers to do so. Unfortunately unless you get ridiculously creative and put in a bunch of extra time instead of cloud service spend, SOC2 compliance is gonna be expensive
- leaflets2 4y agoQubesOS, then you can have many more than two. 32 GB laptop memory is good to have.
- wila 4y agoOh I am well aware about the differences between "how it should be" and what is actually the case when you're a small developer. For this kind of issue one could use VM's where you encrypt the VM with the live customer data. Another option would be to use cloud. But yes.. there's also nothing wrong with having more than one machine to physically separate the systems and thus data. Bonus on that one is that you can shut it down if not needed and as such it won't be accessible over the network unless switched on. Personally -as a small developer myself- I use all of the above.