4 ms·
It looks like the author made the opposite claim three years ago: http://math.ahu.edu.cn/_upload/article/files/85/03/f191ded54991a45d0dde5f53576e/d0cea4af-90b4
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
It looks like the author made the opposite claim three years ago:
http://math.ahu.edu.cn/_upload/article/files/85/03/f191ded54991a45d0dde5f53576e/d0cea4af-90b4-4e99-b8ce-47ffb111328f.pdf http://math.ahu.edu.cn/_upload/article/files/85/03/f191ded54...
- gus_massa 4y agoI'm not going to blame anyone because I make this all the time. Sometimes the poof that something is true or false are very similar. In this case the difference is if some value is 1/2 or 3/4. Anyway, my coworkers find the error before we publish it.
- kklisura 4y agoSomeone reviewed that specific paper here [1]. [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20220128195023/https://motls.blogspot.com/2019/10/some-fun-with-proof-of-riemann.html https://web.archive.org/web/20220128195023/https://motls.blo...
- Quant10 4y agoThis was a review of the author's earlier paper of 2018, in which they were actually claiming a proof of the RH. On their arXiv page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12546 https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12546, the author states that "though all my previous proposed (dis)proofs were flawed, i think the flaws pointed me towards the right direction..."