3 ms·
At face value, it may seem to, but whether it practically would, in the US especially, is a totally different question.
by pitaj 4y ago
At face value, it may seem to, but whether it practically would, in the US especially, is a totally different question.
- hsbauauvhabzb 4y agoAt the very least the reduced access would reduce occurrences and fatality rates. UK and Australia are probably good comparable cultures/case studies.
- MaysonL 4y agoAre there countries where guns have been banned, and mass shootings increase? Are there countries where banned guns have been allowed, and mass shootings increased?
- Alupis 4y agoOther countries have their own version of mass shootings. They often involve knives, explosives, or vehicles instead. You trade one for the other. Mentally unstable/unhealthy people commit mass violent acts regardless of the tools available. In practically zero cases of mass shootings was the assailant completely mentally healthy. Taking away one particular violent tool is not going to solve the mental health problem in this country.
- bb88 4y ago> They often involve knives, explosives, or vehicles instead. Which, btw, are all regulated in the US.
- pksebben 4y agohttps://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/australian-firearms-buyback-and-its-effect-gun-deaths https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/australi...