2 ms·
I completely agree. For me, GitLab is primarily a place where I dump my personal code. Having a monthly $5 subscription for that is acceptable - an annual $228
by crote 4y ago
I completely agree. For me, GitLab is primarily a place where I dump my personal code. Having a monthly $5 subscription for that is acceptable - an annual $228 payment is not, especially because I don't even _need_ the premium features!
I consume maybe a few megabytes of disk space. Why do they want to get rid of me so badly? In the past I have highly recommended GitLab because they are actually really good, but stuff like this does make me rethink that.
- jimhefferon 4y ago> I consume maybe a few megabytes of disk space. Why do they want to get rid of me so badly? Isn't their max size announced a few days ago set to 5 Gigs? I also use it for a few personal projects that I want to make available to others and I also have a few megabytes. That's a very long way from 5 gigs.
- PaywallBuster 4y agoThere's other limits that he/you could be hitting and require an upgrade
- rascul 4y ago> Having a monthly $5 subscription for that is acceptable - an annual $228 payment is not, especially because I don't even _need_ the premium features! For my usage, a $5/month VPS running Gitea will suffice. If I have to pay more than $5/month for git hosting then I'll just do it myself.
- jacooper 4y agoBut if you care about discovery and making it easier for others to contribute, selfhosting is not really an option.