3 ms·
Can we have a proper postmortem about this please, with information about the exact process that was required to obtain this information? > We take our respons
by HL33tibCe7 4y ago
Can we have a proper postmortem about this please, with information about the exact process that was required to obtain this information?
> We take our responsibility to protect your privacy very seriously and it is unfortunate that this happened.
Patently not seriously enough.
- ryandrake 4y agoIt's always hilarious: Whenever any company is caught not taking X seriously, the first thing they do is issue a press release that starts with "Here at COMPANY, we take X very seriously!"
- mwigdahl 4y agoA story an old coworker of mine often told was about the CEO at a previous company he had worked for. This guy was apparently pretty scummy in general, but one time he got threatened with a lawsuit for sexually propositioning his secretary. He settled that issue with an under-the-table payout, but the first thing he did after that was to send out a stern memo to all staff warning them that "we will tolerate ABSOLUTELY NO sexual harassment at this company!"
- tromp 4y agoReminds me of how certain spam emails will proudly proclaim: This is not spam!
- gtowey 4y agoYou can pretty much read a list of company values to find out exactly the things they do only for show. The companies I've worked for have always ignored any stated values as soon as it costs them money or gets in the way of making money. Which is, you know, always.
- hnburnsy 4y agohere is the bug report... https://hackerone.com/reports/1439026 https://hackerone.com/reports/1439026
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]