4 ms·
I don't have the diffs in front of me, but I'm fairly sure this predates the MS acquisition by quite a while.
by ollien 4y ago
I don't have the diffs in front of me, but I'm fairly sure this predates the MS acquisition by quite a while.
- xtracto 4y agoPrior to MS acquisition, Github free offering was really bad: No private repos, no CI pipeline and I think there was not real "team".
- tonmoy 4y agoDo you have a source for this? I vaguely remember GitHub starting to offer private repos when GitLab started getting popular.
- ollien 4y agoGithub raised the 5 repo limit to infinite in 2016 https://github.blog/2016-05-11-introducing-unlimited-private-repositories/ https://github.blog/2016-05-11-introducing-unlimited-private... And made private repos free after the acquisition https://github.blog/2019-01-07-new-year-new-github/ https://github.blog/2019-01-07-new-year-new-github/
- ollien 4y agoWell, Github (free or not) had no CI until Github Actions, which was after the acquisition. Integration with things like Travis were already there and free.
- wink 4y agoThat's a weird definition of bad. It was free and it worked as advertised without providing every imaginable feature.