4 ms·
What is the implication of the findings?
by aaaaaaaaata 4y ago
What is the implication of the findings?
- sschueller 4y agoETH 2.0 delayed by another year...
- quickthrower2 4y agoETH 2.0 sounds like commercial fusion power.
- pelagicAustral 4y agoHalf-Life 3 much?
- api 4y agoThere's steady but slow progress in fusion in energy density and power output, so no.
- inphovore 4y agoThe issue with fusion has been the same for the last 50 years. Harvesting the gamma’s full electron volt right out of the reaction. We’re still 50+ years away. Nothing in modern technology suggests otherwise. Science media has to explain why billions are dumped into these programs each year (as though edge science isn’t enough.) In the meantime, everyone will be happy if we can harvest just enough to make the cost of the exchange worth while. most optimistically through harvesting the heat from a sustained reaction (which is 1000 x less potential).
- shakezula 4y agoWhy would this have anything to do with Eth2 when it’s explicitly a vulnerability in Proof of Work systems?
- oneoff786 4y agoGood for crypto
- dang 4y agoCould you please stop posting unsubstantive and/or flamebait comments? You've been doing it a lot, unfortunately, and it's not what this site is for. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- xbar 4y agoProbably that if you weren't mining on f2pool for the last few years you were severely disadvantaged, and that if every other pool doesn't start executing this "attack", they are not playing the ETH game correctly.
- mistrial9 4y agoexaggeration does not lend clarity .. an advantage is short-lived, like so many opportunistic moves in real life? the math says that the "severity" of the disadvantage is related to the change in difficulty at that juncture