Money is supposed to represent production (agricultural, industrial and services) and it's usage is a way we invented to share a country production between the

Money is supposed to represent production (agricultural, industrial and services) and it's usage is a way we invented to share a country production between the participants. The fact that you can claim a part of the production without producing yourself is silly (and necessary since we age), but that's how the system work. Now, the morality of how you do it, wether you are doing that by owning land, owning stuff already made, scamming old people, receiving government pensions or using predatory endeavors to capture money from a captive public, doesn't come from the system. This morality we decide collectively by voting laws an politicians who have a view on the question. There, you can have socialist, liberal or conservative morality (and a few other) to choose what is acceptable or not. For example, conservative are deontologists (in my country) while you have a mix of deontologism and nihilism amongst people on the far right (and far, far left). All that to say you probably aren't an Uber -capitalist (i had a whole paragraph to explain what it meant to me and that this doesn't exist anymore in developed countries, but i had to go deep and it wasn't that interesting)