4 ms·
The implication is that it's somehow better to be "self reliant" but that is also basically impossible.
by bradhe 4y ago
The implication is that it's somehow better to be "self reliant" but that is also basically impossible.
- nradov 4y agoThe implication is that it's better to not be reliant on an adversary. Some level of reliance on reliable allies is fine.
- woweoe 4y agoBut that would be a major challenge. Virtually all of the Asian continent save for Japan and Korea (who are reliant on the US for military purposes) in some way kept neutral and/or allied with Russia.
- Isinlor 4y agoOnly North Korea, Syria, Eritrea and Belarus decided to vote against resolution condemning Russian invasion on Ukraine. Russia has no allies. Even China is reluctant to take over what remains from Russian market abandoned by Western companies. https://twitter.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/1499072011729096705 https://twitter.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/1499072011729096705
- wobbleblob 4y agoIt's more about being reliant on one source under the control of a potential rival.