> Solar is not the only clean, cheap energy source. Wind coexists nicely with agriculture. Then why not nuclear too? The world sorely needs options where we ca

> Solar is not the only clean, cheap energy source. Wind coexists nicely with agriculture. Then why not nuclear too? The world sorely needs options where we can spend some CapEx and solve global warming. I see nothing wrong with a mix of hydro, solar, geothermal, wind, and nuclear. There is no reason not to expect capital efficiencies in larger nuclear build-outs compared to the sporadic reactors we've built for the last ~50 years. Right now we are seeing coal and natural gas plants getting built because there aren't enough renewable options. As has been the case for the last 50 years while renewables catch up.