3 ms·
If they went to cars, they'd have to spend a lot of time and money moving them around. And a car that will move costs a lot more than a chunk of concrete. And t
by Hizonner 4y ago
If they went to cars, they'd have to spend a lot of time and money moving them around. And a car that will move costs a lot more than a chunk of concrete. And the car has to be registered.
According to the article, the city is set up to tow cars, but not set up to move the concrete blocks. The blocks are actually probably easier to move than the cars, if you set up a system for doing it. A flatbed with a crane could move those blocks out in time comparable to hitching up a car for towing, and carry more than one at a time.
On edit: cars would probably get vandalized, too. I am not saying I support that, but it makes rotating cars even more impractical.
- jaimex2 4y agoThey'd find something else. Trailers, skip bins, cones along with pushing their local representative to put in permit zones etc. The issue is still they need to give people somewhere to live. Public housing, RV parks, rental legislation etc.