5 ms·
Sure, but old computers managed to get things done with much lower resources. What really seems missing in old computers is memory.
by ffhhj 4y ago
Sure, but old computers managed to get things done with much lower resources. What really seems missing in old computers is memory.
- magicalhippo 4y agoSure but they had much lower resources all around. Why cripple a high-performance CPU by not having RAM?
- ffhhj 4y agoSSD speeds will probably continue increasing, so removing RAM will take us about 20 years back to the past, with the difference that these will have seemingly "unlimited" memory. Imagine Windows 2000 never complaining about being out of memory.
- demindiro 4y ago> Imagine Windows 2000 never complaining about being out of memory. Just put a huge swap file on it.
- Sugimot0 4y agoOr use zram or zswap https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Improving_performance#zram_or_zswap https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Improving_performance#zram_...
- teraflop 4y agoGetting rid of DRAM would take us back a lot farther than 20 years. A typical desktop PC circa 2000 using PC133 RAM would have had a memory access latency in the tens of nanoseconds.
- magicalhippo 4y ago> SSD speeds will probably continue increasing, so removing RAM will take us about 20 years back to the past I think you significantly overestimate how much they can reduce latency for SSDs. Keep in mind, even a 80286 from 1982 had a memory latency in the 200ns range[1]. [1]: https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2004/10/6401-latency-lags-bandwith/ https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2004/10/6401-latency-lags-ban... (view PDF, table 1)
- rasz 4y ago500 us is still 2.5 orders of magnitude slower than Commodore 64 from 1982
- Dylan16807 4y agoOld computers were vastly weaker in a lot of ways, but memory latency isn't one of those things. A 6502 was also hitting memory every few hundred nanoseconds. You could make it work with Optane except oops that just got discontinued.