4 ms·
Sounds like they chose to use actual pay adjusted for stock appreciation instead of notional value of the pay packet at the time it was given, which seems reall
by shawabawa3 4y ago
Sounds like they chose to use actual pay adjusted for stock appreciation instead of notional value of the pay packet at the time it was given, which seems really dumb to the point the whole study is useless
- gnicholas 4y agoI've only ever heard people complain about "CEO X made $Z million last year, which is 40x the average employee pay". These complaints reference the total comp package, IIRC. To the extent that this is what people are talking about, a study that looks at this larger figure seems useful. It would be good to cut things up more ways, if it gives different results.