3 ms·
Apple M2 SoC Analysis – Worse CPU Efficiency Compared to the M1
- MBCook 4y agoOdd. The headline doesn’t seem supported by the article’s conclusion.
- throwawaylinux 4y agoHow do you figure?? The conclusion says > However, the higher clocks require more power and a maximum performance advantage of 18 % in multi-core scenarios is result of around 40 % higher power consumption, so the CPU of the new M2 is not as efficient as the M1 anymore.
- type0 4y agoSeems to be the case, with passive cooling on macbook air m2 you will hardly notice a difference compared to m1
- rowanG077 4y agoThe performance per watt is clearly a LOT worse then the M1. You really can't make it more clear then the graphs in the article.
- smoldesu 4y ago> All these values are no indication for the upcoming Pro models of the M2 that we expect in the updated MacBook Pro 14 and 16 models later this year since these chips are supposed to be manufactured in a new 3 nm process. Wasn't that the same story we heard about the M2, too? I'm starting to think these rumors are some Mark Gurman originals...
- rowanG077 4y agoDoes anyone know whether this slip up by Apple is because the M2 should have been on 3nm, which was delayed? Honestly that's the only way I can really explain this. The M1 is actually the superior chip.
- derbOac 4y agoThe takeaway I got was that the M2 performance was better, but that it took disproportionately more power, so the efficiency was lower. It depends on what your criteria are. It does sort of somewhat explain complaints about throttling with the M2 systems. This article does have me reevaluating whether or not to get an M2 13-inch. There's other things to consider as well but it's an important one.
- ksec 4y agoThose M1 measurement do not align with the detail test done by Anandtech. Which leads to me to believe there is some sort of flaw or misjudgement in the test. I have bookmarked this and may be taking another look at it later. Or if someone has time to dig deeper.