4 ms·

I'd like to be a counterpoint for the Stadia bashing here: I'm not much of a gamer, but I've always been interested in playing Red Dead Redemption 2. However,

by lenova 4y ago

I'd like to be a counterpoint for the Stadia bashing here: I'm not much of a gamer, but I've always been interested in playing Red Dead Redemption 2. However, I neither had a console nor a PC with a decent enough graphics card. This spring, I picked up a Google TV with Chromecast, and realized I could pair any bluetooth device with it. I bought a cheapo PS4-like controller off of Amazon, saw that RDR2 was on sale on Stadia, and gave it a shot. I have to say, the experience was quite pleasing. No need for an expensive/out-of-stock graphics card. No need for a dedicated console. If feels like a great solution for a casual gamer. Overall, I've been impressed with the experience, and haven't experienced any lag or game stutters. Heck, it even plays Cyberpunk smoothly! Stadia definitely lacks in terms of marketing and game library, but I feel like it's a concept that works.

InefficientRed 4y ago
> casual gamer Same. I had a month off between jobs and used a week of my evenings off to play through red dead. I don't particularly care about losing the license, because I just wanted to play the game through. Haven't touched it since then. Stadia's ideal market wasn't "real gamers" -- those folks will buy rigs. Their ideal market was people like you and me, who don't have the time or interest to justify purchasing a gaming machine but still want to play through a AAA title or two every once in a while.
- lurker619 4y ago
  Another same here. I didn't need to buy a console, a tv or even a controller. It feels like unlimited power to be able to access RDR2 on just another tab - 13 year old me would have gone crazy :)
omega3 4y ago
I've tried to find a flaw with this argument and admittedly it's pretty hard. As long as you accept to pay a above the market price for the game and you don't care about retaining ownership then it somehow makes sense. I'm guessing this value proposition is what made it unsustainable for Google.
- InefficientRed 4y ago
  The need for GPUs during an unprecedented spike in demand for chip fab capacity couldn't have helped. I think the basic model will eventually work out, though. The bandwidth is there. The compute has to be cheap enough that the biz model works by just taking the retailer's cut of the title sale + maybe a tad more. The tad more can come from one-time hardware sales and maybe better negotiated cuts of the sale from the studios. I would never ever have purchased a copy of any AAA title without Stadia and similar services. I think the same is true for almost all Stadia purchases. But Google's failure here makes sense. It's a low margin game. google sucks at low margin games.

by lenova 4y ago

InefficientRed 4y ago

> casual gamer Same. I had a month off between jobs and used a week of my evenings off to play through red dead. I don't particularly care about losing the license, because I just wanted to play the game through. Haven't touched it since then. Stadia's ideal market wasn't "real gamers" -- those folks will buy rigs. Their ideal market was people like you and me, who don't have the time or interest to justify purchasing a gaming machine but still want to play through a AAA title or two every once in a while.

lurker619 4y ago
Another same here. I didn't need to buy a console, a tv or even a controller. It feels like unlimited power to be able to access RDR2 on just another tab - 13 year old me would have gone crazy :)

omega3 4y ago

I've tried to find a flaw with this argument and admittedly it's pretty hard. As long as you accept to pay a above the market price for the game and you don't care about retaining ownership then it somehow makes sense. I'm guessing this value proposition is what made it unsustainable for Google.

InefficientRed 4y ago
The need for GPUs during an unprecedented spike in demand for chip fab capacity couldn't have helped. I think the basic model will eventually work out, though. The bandwidth is there. The compute has to be cheap enough that the biz model works by just taking the retailer's cut of the title sale + maybe a tad more. The tad more can come from one-time hardware sales and maybe better negotiated cuts of the sale from the studios. I would never ever have purchased a copy of any AAA title without Stadia and similar services. I think the same is true for almost all Stadia purchases. But Google's failure here makes sense. It's a low margin game. google sucks at low margin games.