3 ms·
I think having a strictly-typed language is completely undervalued, especially when ones solution is to use a library that only attempts to enforce types at the
by chrisandchris 4y ago
I think having a strictly-typed language is completely undervalued, especially when ones solution is to use a library that only attempts to enforce types at the runtime level (as I understand).
Why not trying to catch type issues earlier than in Prod?
- mejutoco 4y agoI agree with your sentiment. It is nice to use a strictly-typed language but Python is not one. Not all projects/teams I take part in want to change languages. On the other side, this runtime error can be triggered by the tests in a ci/cd pipeline. While not ideal, in practice this can end up being much earlier than in production.