5 ms·

Senate Bill Takes Aim at Visa, Mastercard Credit-Card Fees

13 points by saguntum 4y ago

tims33 4y ago
Opening credit to a network not affiliated with Visa or MC would be a huge change. It is hard to believe this would pass into law, but perhaps it is an opening salvo in a negotiation with Visa and MC.
ilaksh 4y ago
Cryptocurrency makes credit cards (which require disclosing credit card numbers for payment) entirely obsolete (by using cryptographic signatures on transactions, that don't expose keys).
- wonnor 4y ago
  Let me try! Credit cards make cryptocurrency (which doesn't have broad merchant support, charge-back ability, and, you know, the literal "credit" part of it) entirely obsolete.
  - ilaksh 4y ago
    The charge back is only important because people have to give away their credentials every time they make a payment. In the context of the existence of cryptography (and cryptocurrency), this is laughable. (Credit cards were invented before public key cryptography.) Advanced cryptocurrencies enable a much more robust and diverse set of credit options.
    - kayfox 4y ago
      > The charge back is only important because people have to give away their credentials every time they make a payment. So like, merchants not delivering is not a thing at all?
    - _aavaa_ 4y ago
      > The charge back is only important because people have to give away their credentials every time they make a payment. What? A charge back is important so that a dispute can actually be resolved. What recourse does a regular person have if they are defrauded by the other party. Or if the other party didn’t hold up their end.
      - muttled 4y ago
        Small claims court seems to be one of the only options at that point. While it's still a valid tool, it can be a big pain to go through with it and I'd bet a lot of people would just take the loss. It also assumes a lot of things like being able to locate the party to serve them.
        _aavaa_ 4y ago
        I agree that it's a thing, but the difference between a chargeback and small claims court if you're a person who wants to charge back a company is night and day. Almost nobody is going to use that avenue.
      - ilaksh 4y ago
        The first reason it is necessary is that the actual secret is revealed so the transaction entirely relies on trustworthy parties.
        _aavaa_ 4y ago
        What secret are you talking about? What do you do if the other party does not hold up their end of the bargain after they received the money??
        ilaksh 4y ago
        The credit card number lol. That's a different issue. First issue is much more primary.
        4y ago
Proven 4y ago
[dead]

13 points by saguntum 4y ago

Opening credit to a network not affiliated with Visa or MC would be a huge change. It is hard to believe this would pass into law, but perhaps it is an opening salvo in a negotiation with Visa and MC.

ilaksh 4y ago

Cryptocurrency makes credit cards (which require disclosing credit card numbers for payment) entirely obsolete (by using cryptographic signatures on transactions, that don't expose keys).

wonnor 4y ago
Let me try! Credit cards make cryptocurrency (which doesn't have broad merchant support, charge-back ability, and, you know, the literal "credit" part of it) entirely obsolete.
- ilaksh 4y ago
  The charge back is only important because people have to give away their credentials every time they make a payment. In the context of the existence of cryptography (and cryptocurrency), this is laughable. (Credit cards were invented before public key cryptography.) Advanced cryptocurrencies enable a much more robust and diverse set of credit options.
  - kayfox 4y ago
    > The charge back is only important because people have to give away their credentials every time they make a payment. So like, merchants not delivering is not a thing at all?
  - _aavaa_ 4y ago
    > The charge back is only important because people have to give away their credentials every time they make a payment. What? A charge back is important so that a dispute can actually be resolved. What recourse does a regular person have if they are defrauded by the other party. Or if the other party didn’t hold up their end.
    - muttled 4y ago
      Small claims court seems to be one of the only options at that point. While it's still a valid tool, it can be a big pain to go through with it and I'd bet a lot of people would just take the loss. It also assumes a lot of things like being able to locate the party to serve them.
      - _aavaa_ 4y ago
        I agree that it's a thing, but the difference between a chargeback and small claims court if you're a person who wants to charge back a company is night and day. Almost nobody is going to use that avenue.
    - ilaksh 4y ago
      The first reason it is necessary is that the actual secret is revealed so the transaction entirely relies on trustworthy parties.
      - _aavaa_ 4y ago
        What secret are you talking about? What do you do if the other party does not hold up their end of the bargain after they received the money??
        ilaksh 4y ago
        The credit card number lol. That's a different issue. First issue is much more primary.
        4y ago

Proven 4y ago

[dead]