3 ms·
> This experiment was not intended to see whether training GPT-3 on Dennett’s writing would produce some sentient machine philosopher; it was also not a Turing
by FabHK 4y ago
> This experiment was not intended to see whether training GPT-3 on Dennett’s writing would produce some sentient machine philosopher; it was also not a Turing test, Schwitzgebel said.
How was it not a Turing test? Because it lacks interactivity?
- joe_the_user 4y agoYes, lack of interactivity. Computers with explicit or implicit limits on their interactivity have been convincing people they're human for a long time. It seems like the only thing that's hard for robots is when someone uses language to set a different structure of interaction - if you say, "draw a picture with thus and thus shapes, then tell me what it looks like" and similar things.