4 ms·
It sounds like you're not having enough coordination meetings. You can make communication more efficient if you add more levels of hierarchy. MBAs are good at m
by threatripper 4y ago
It sounds like you're not having enough coordination meetings. You can make communication more efficient if you add more levels of hierarchy. MBAs are good at managing. Engineers are often wandering off-topic, so put MBAs in between the engineers to manage the communication and avoid unsupervised engineer-engineer-contact between different groups.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- noduerme 4y agoI was waiting for a /s at the end of this comment, but now I can't tell if you're kidding.
- raisin_churn 4y agoIf MBAs weren't economically efficient, the market wouldn't make so many of them and companies wouldn't pay them so much.
- elcritch 4y agoI refer you to the discussion a few days back on people not being accurately modeled as rational agents: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32181987 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32181987 Companies and entire markets follow similar patterns of only having bounded rationality, IMHO. Markets can also have decades of slack or delay from stimulus to outcomes. Take the slow decline of Boeing after acquiring McDonnell Douglas and their MBA heavy structure. https://qz.com/1776080/how-the-mcdonnell-douglas-boeing-merger-led-to-the-737-max-crisis/ https://qz.com/1776080/how-the-mcdonnell-douglas-boeing-merg...
- ramphastidae 4y agoThis is pure fantasy. Markets have never been efficient and actors have never been rational.
- marcosdumay 4y agoAnd you surely got enough answers showing why the "\s" is important...
- noduerme 4y agoThat's like looking at America and saying obesity and opioid addiction must be drivers of economic success.
- tomp 4y agoMBA schools are just credentials laundering services.
- ChrisMarshallNY 4y agoThey need more morons. Source: https://www.mit.edu/people/dmredish/wwwMLRF/links/Humor/Administratium.html https://www.mit.edu/people/dmredish/wwwMLRF/links/Humor/Admi...