> mentioned the head of the project doesn't know I exist Was this said in a way that may have been trying to get you to feel like you're missing out and encour

> mentioned the head of the project doesn't know I exist Was this said in a way that may have been trying to get you to feel like you're missing out and encourage you to come back to office? Not saying that's appropriate, but your other comment makes me think this org doesn't have a strong remote culture, and so likely one to stack the optics against remote work. I'm wondering if the comment was made more in the spirit of "[as the remote member of this project] the CEO doesn't even know who you are, and thinks I made the whole thing [which is clearly a shit deal, and so by implication you should really come work in the office]" (bracket context as unsaid, but implied) Anyhow, this sucks, and I feel for your sense of being mistreated. Attribution is important, and a failure to offer it (nevermind their views on remote work) is a bit of a smell