3 ms·
Probably you are busy because 99% of your customers do not face any possible threat but are just paranoid, that's it. I am personally fine if all those paranoid
by twawaaay 4y ago
Probably you are busy because 99% of your customers do not face any possible threat but are just paranoid, that's it. I am personally fine if all those paranoid people will generate enough market to make open source firmware/hardware sustainable.
Also, glitter nail polish does not work. It can be lifted and reapplied without disturbing.
I suggest that painting and photographing multiple individual blobs on each device is inefficient and a better method would be putting the device in a bag of coloured rice and evacuating air (was discussed on HN some time ago).
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- IshKebab 4y ago> It can be lifted and reapplied without disturbing. From a screw? That seems implausible but I'd love to be proven wrong.
- stonegray 4y agoDepending on the T(ce) and solvent compatibility/bond strength to surrounding plastic it could be as easy as pouring some LN2 on it and it might even pop itself out. The whole glitter thing does provide really strong security against any attempt to melt/dissolve it, as well as good resilience against mechanical attacks, especially when adhered to materials it bonds strongly to, typically ones that dissolve in the solvents it contains. (iso acetone, mek, etc)
- beanjuiceII 4y agoI work in interdiction/interception (a long time now), yes people are way over paranoid about this type of stuff. Media makes so much sound like we're some james bond movie..
- redactions 4y agoWould you mind explaining more about your job?