3 ms·

It's the 1950s for it. It's real, people use it, but it's more a toy and has some breakthroughs ahead of it to be at scale. Fwiw after following it closely for

It's the 1950s for it. It's real, people use it, but it's more a toy and has some breakthroughs ahead of it to be at scale. Fwiw after following it closely for about 3 years now, I wouldn't speculatively load up on it. Even the theory of problems that could benefit from it, if it existed as scale, only has a few

farmin 4y ago
Ok thanks. I appreciate that insight.
jnwatson 4y ago
I thought so too, until I waded into a post-quantum crypto algorithm paper. It turns out you need to understand how a quantum computer works in order to design an algorithm resistant to it.