I agree. Although I still think it should be possible to make some things obsolete in C++. The technical debt is real, and the language can hardly improve if o

I agree. Although I still think it should be possible to make some things obsolete in C++. The technical debt is real, and the language can hardly improve if old codebases are slowing down the evolution of the language. I already wrote several times that I would like a new C++-like language, but without the complexity of C++. D, zig and rust are fine but they're not simple languages to use. I want the nice things of C++ (string, a few containers, a bit of syntax sugar, the most useful std stuff), with enough simplicity from python or C. I just use the simple parts of C++, and I only want those parts. I just want the KISS simplicity. Carbon is not that, neither is rust zig or D.