3 ms·
It's tricky because if you do it in secret, it's not MAD, and it's not actually an effective deterrent. It only works as a deterrent if you break the treaty an
by bpodgursky 4y ago
It's tricky because if you do it in secret, it's not MAD, and it's not actually an effective deterrent.
It only works as a deterrent if you break the treaty and everyone knows you've broken the treaty (whether you publicly admit it or not) but we aren't there afaik.
- toast0 4y ago> It only works as a deterrent if you break the treaty and everyone knows you've broken the treaty (whether you publicly admit it or not) but we aren't there afaik. It could work if it gets to the point where 'only an idiot' wouldn't have broken the treaty, so you can just assume everyone has, because the idea is fairly obvious, the technology is easy, and there's not any other good options. Or if a rogue state does it or something like it, then you can assume the US and Russia have done it or will be doing it shortly.
- cupofpython 4y agobut then you dont actually have to spend resources breaking the treaty since everyone is already assuming you did. at best it's just an "are you feeling lucky?" situation unless you publicly prove it