3 ms·
I think the main point was that these are not secured loans. The developers operate in a ponzi like fashion, so there is nothing to foreclose on and no cash to
by dahdum 4y ago
I think the main point was that these are not secured loans. The developers operate in a ponzi like fashion, so there is nothing to foreclose on and no cash to claw back by the bank.
I’m not sure how big of a problem that really is, but I could see it toppling a number of local banks.
- naveen99 4y agoTypically banks release money as construction incurs expenses, not all at once before construction begins. Atleast in the usa.
- chii 4y agoi think this point is not clear to many people! Construction companies in the USA (and the west typically) don't get paid up front 100% for the full amount, but is often paid "pro-rata" based on milestones or % completed. The funds a released by an escrow (which the purchaser and the bank, if it's a mortgage, would choose). The situation described in china is not like that above - the developers got paid 100% of the cost of the build upfront, by the purchaser. The bank loans the funds to the purchaser for this purpose (at 60% LVR for example). The bank has the title as collateral - but since the property isn't built, there's no property to sell if it goes bad. It's just the land title. The reason the banks do this is because it's a politically driven mandate - the CCP in the past, wanted more construction, and this is one way to drive risk away from developers (so there'd be more developers!).
- naveen99 4y agoI think you can buy land at 50% LTV in the us also.