4 ms·
In theory I could learn Erlang and patch the source code as well, however, I would prefer a proper solution, not a hacky workaround. It doesn't make sense if y
by codedokode 4y ago
In theory I could learn Erlang and patch the source code as well, however, I would prefer a proper solution, not a hacky workaround.
It doesn't make sense if you first open the port and then block it with a firewall.
Also, this is a bad idea because firewall config is kept separately from RabbitMQ config, it is easy to forget that you have a RabbitMQ instance exposed to the whole Internet and accidentally unblock the port.
- datavirtue 4y agoStill on about "accidentally unblocking ports?" Network security is not a "hacky workaround." We don't expose RabbitMQ clusters to the internet. Full stop.
- codedokode 4y agoI don't need a cluster, I need a single instance, but RabbitMQ doesn't allow to disable clustering. That's the problem and instead of proper solution people suggest blocking it with a firewall.
- ikiris 4y agothis is like setting up a one box kubernetes... like... why? if you arent a distributed system, why do you even need a multi node messaging system? there are way better solutions for single node.
- codedokode 4y agoFor example, I might install RabbitMQ on a dev server. I do not need any clusters there.