3 ms·
The harm is real, even if you try to ridicule it. None of your refutation is founded on the reality of the harm (or what was claimed, AFAICT). This is called a
by krageon 4y ago
The harm is real, even if you try to ridicule it. None of your refutation is founded on the reality of the harm (or what was claimed, AFAICT). This is called a strawman.
- vasco 4y agoBut I didn't say there was no harm? I asked for examples as it's hard for me to picture them. Another commenter gave a good example of how government agencies can use this data for nefarious things, I was originally curious of ways of profiting from knowing what was initially discussed, when the cycle is. I think because the topic is charged you saw ridicule where there was none.