6 ms·
Hey CSMastermind, I'm founder at Checkly and I got a ping we were mentioned. We do send out some "getting started" messages on autopilot. We also did a product
by tnolet 4y ago
Hey CSMastermind, I'm founder at Checkly and I got a ping we were mentioned. We do send out some "getting started" messages on autopilot. We also did a product launch Thursday and then our regular changelog on Monday. That probably was overwhelming. If you could email me on tim -at- checklyhq -dot- com I will track down if we hit the the spam cannon too hard.
- wccrawford 4y agoI don't use your tool and I'm unrelated to CSMastermind, but I can tell you that you absolutely hit the "spam cannon" too hard. 5 messages in 48 hours? That's absolutely ridiculous. They could all have been 1 message if it was important that they get that info, and it could have been 0 messages if it wasn't.
- tnolet 4y agoYou are correct. I will figure out two things. 1. Why our fancy expensive mailing/marketing tool (Intercom) does not spread these messages in a relaxed fashion (it should) 2. If of those five messages, maybe two were the obligatory "confirm your email" and standard "Welcome to Checkly, this is what we do" TL;DR we should not spam.
- tnolet 4y agoWe checked our Intercom. We spammed. One user got six emails in a 5 day span. There were some separate initiatives going on. We didn't check the settings and current outgoing mail. We will change it. BTW: all of this was done without any bad intent. It's 100% us being stupid and not coordinating and being diligent enough.
- stalfosknight 4y agoYou only get one chance to make a first impression.
- geoduck14 4y ago>You only get one chance to make a first impression. Well, this person had 6 first impressions.
- tpoacher 4y agoSend a seventh to apologize! /s (on a serious note, good on you for taking action though. +1)
- cto_of_antifa 4y ago
- sonofhans 4y agoThis is such an impressive series of responses. I know some folks are flipping you shit here, but I’ve seen a lot of people try to “engage” with customers, in HN and elsewhere, and I think you’ve done it really nicely. You sound like a human; you admit mistakes; you follow up. Good on you.
- kaoD 4y agoI know this is well-intentioned and not an automated message, but I find it ironic that you managed to get an additional message to him over here.
- tpoacher 4y agoone asking them to establish contact for communication to continue, no less. xD I can't help be reminded of those "if you'd like to unsubscribe call us so we can harass you with offers even more" you see in some company terms and conditions.
- oxfordmale 4y agotnolet, if I get five emails from a company with 48 hours, I will set up a spam rule for them. If I really need to get that much help to get started, your UX design is likely not very good.
- tnolet 4y agoYou are correct. I’m the same. Our emails are even pretty good. Our UX is pretty damn good. Somehow we dropped the ball here.
- kthejoker2 4y agoWhen you fix it, write up a post mortem so others can lesrn from your mistake! Since it's distressingly common.
- musicale 4y ago> if we hit the the spam cannon too hard Maybe consider, oh I don't know, not deploying a spam cannon in the first place? The good news is that this sort of thing is enough to trigger the spam filter in my email program so I'll never see it. Companies have this astonishing arrogance assuming they should be able to interrupt actual humans with robot messages from noreply@crapcorp.com - typically marketing messages that cannot actually be replied to and do not qualify as respectful communication.
- geoduck14 4y ago>Maybe consider, oh I don't know, not deploying a spam cannon in the first place? I'm not at all related to the people you are talking to, but I am a dev who has accidentally built spam cannons before. It is surprisingly easy to spam people - you need to deliberately build in checks - and put them in the right places to prevent spam cannons.