3 ms·
> If you retract papers that were just 'wrong' you would be retracting at least 50% of the work published in a lot of fields. Wouldn't that be a win? Don't peo
by NiloCK 4y ago
> If you retract papers that were just 'wrong' you would be retracting at least 50% of the work published in a lot of fields.
Wouldn't that be a win? Don't people read & reference these published, reviewed, non-retracted 'wrong' papers with the assumption that they are right?
- nradov 4y agoA competent researcher wouldn't make that assumption. Random idiots might do so, though.