3 ms·
Incredibly low resolution for the size monitor too. Is the form factor the novelty worthy of sharing?
by jsjohnst 4y ago
Incredibly low resolution for the size monitor too. Is the form factor the novelty worthy of sharing?
- beebeepka 4y agoI think someone is just doing PR, hence the dowvotes
- iLoveOncall 4y agoSince when is 1440p low resolution? A 4K IPS panel is by no means the standard, even in 2022.
- jsjohnst 4y agoI wouldn’t own a 4K monitor that was over 24” and I don’t use monitors that are under 25” anymore. So yes, that means the entire market for monitors I’d own is around 6 in total, which is ridiculous being that it’s 2022, but that’s the world we live in.
- Matthias247 4y agoIt is rather low 110 dpi, „retina“ devices are doing > 220 dpi for nearly a decade and are much easier on the eyes. Now unfortunately those are still not common in external monitors - probably because they require 5k resolution for todays display sizes. But even the 160 dpi of a 4K @ 27“ screen is such a massive step forward in picture quality and readability that I couldn’t ever see myself going back to 110dpi or less. This should especially apply if a display is marketed as ergonomic
- sicher 4y agoThis LG is just shy of 140 dpi.
- Matthias247 4y agoYou are right. I got confused by the mention of 1440p - which is not really what this screen has at 28“. Still not really in the hidpi category. I assume it would be most usable with something along 1.5-1.75 scaling, which produces inferior results to 2x.
- sicher 4y agoI would prefer higher dpi too. If someone would make a hidpi square (ish) screen I would buy it in a heartbeat. The Huawei Mateview looks great but can't swivel to portrait, unfortunately.
- sicher 4y agoI just bought one of these (and love it! I write a lot) It has the same PPI as the 32" 4k Dell I run at work.
- robertoandred 4y ago32” at 4K is pretty low ppi
- sicher 4y agoAbout 140. But I find it okay since I like to keep the screen not too close.