9 ms·
FCC orders carriers to stop delivering auto warranty robocalls
- causality0 4y agoIt's interesting the FCC takes a stand against robocalls while the USPS would happily deliver offers to sell my grandmother into slavery directly into my mailbox. It baffles me that all spam doesn't fall under the definition of harassment.
- testbjjl 4y agoThe USPS at a time was the center of a lot of communities (open on Sundays, serving alcohol) before other forms of communication and has a legislative history to disseminate “information” independently due to “information” not being uniformly accessible in all states.
- withinboredom 4y agoYep. And you used to be able to mail your children to their grandparents or whomever too.
- mustyouremember 4y agoThe USPS is required to maintain unusually massive pension obligations, and it is expected to pay for itself. They would sell their own grandmothers for a chance to balance their books, hence the Faustian junk mail bargain.
- gsk22 4y agoNot as of 4 months ago: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senate-approves-50-billion-postal-service-relief-bill-2022-03-08/ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senate-approves-50-billi...
- SoftTalker 4y agoJunk mail is wasteful and a PITA but it isn't quite as intrusive as a phone call. You pick up your mail when it's convenient, and it's easy to identify junk mail and discard it without it really interruping your day or having it change its message when it sees you heading for the trash bin.
- jjtheblunt 4y ago> when it's convenient not in general: my wife is a letter carrier part time for USPS, and the overwhelming 2 problems they face are people never getting around to it being convenient, and Amazon shipping huge packages via USPS. Regarding convenience, mail gets recalled and addressees have to be seriously inconvenienced to retrieve it. this isn't a punitive thing, but a logistics issue.
- causality0 4y agoBeing open 8:30-5:00 means the only people actually able to use the post office are those of us doing shift work.
- dredmorbius 4y agoIt's long since passed the point where the task of sorting through junk mail for the very rare valid item is a tedious and error-prone chore. Again, the real harm is in missing legitimate postal mail. You can request junk mail, including bulk unaddressed mail be excluded. And reject delivery requiring your carrier to pick it up and dispose of it.
- jjtheblunt 4y agoI used to pay for a UPS Store USPS box, exactly to enable filtering of junk mail...it was an option for the box. worked fantastically.
- betwixthewires 4y agoYep, I just don't check my mail. I get emails for my bills, I don't get checks in the mail or anything, I track deliveries of things I've ordered. Mail is sort of useless nowadays anyway, there's no reason to send me paper when there are a myriad of ways to contact me electronically.
- bmitc 4y agoThe USPS does that to survive because one party, funded by owners of competitors, would like to see the USPS go away. if they were simply funded as they should be, then they wouldn't have to send all that.
- seanp2k2 4y agoGreat political strat too: ruin the thing that is competing with the businesses paying for your campaign while pointing out how badly that thing is doing. Try to make it as unbearably bad as possible for everyone and pitch fixing it as part of your campaign. Then just privatize it so your friends can extort everyone previously served by the thing. Public schools are another example of this.
- feet 4y agoAh yes, the republican strategy. While dems sit idly by and collect donations
- legalcorrection 4y agoAny bill to ban junk mail would fail in Congress because the postal workers union here is very cozy with the Democrats and would never support it.
- zugi 4y agoThe title says "ordered" but that doesn't match the article text: > The FCC said it has authorized all U.S.-based voice service providers to stop carrying traffic from... Why is this distinction important? The FCC by default requires carriers to put all calls through, and this rule has prevented phone companies from cleaning up the robocalls that have become ubiquitous. So it's nice that the FCC is finally allowing carriers to clean up a little bit of the robocall problem, but lets be clear about this: this is a problem of the FCC's making that it is only very belatedly allowing carriers to fix.
- kevinventullo 4y agoThis is nice, but I wonder if those responsible are going to be punished.
- MisterBastahrd 4y agoPerhaps there should be a law similar to the law on the books regarding debt collectors who harass people. $1K fine every time a customer requests and is denied data regarding who supplied the robocaller with their personal information. I was in a traffic accident last year, and I slow-walked getting my car fixed before they informed me that it was actually totaled. Within 3 weeks of purchasing my new vehicle, the robocallers knew that I had a new car and were now calling me regarding the extended warranty of the new car as well as the totaled one.
- dredmorbius 4y agoWho specifically would be actionable / liable here? The warranty provider? Your telco? Peering telco? The data provider? The call centre? How do you find / sue them?
- powerhour 4y agoThe FCC ought to mandate traceability for all calls. Every hop adds their signature to the call and the end user can store and analyze the result. The first hop is the organization you sue. As an aside: you could then easily add carriers or intermediaries to a block list. You could even subscribe to a distributed block list. You could subscribe to an always-allow list that contains hospitals, police stations, and emergency services. It'd be so much better than what we have now.
- dredmorbius 4y agoThanks. That would require some major respecification of PSTN calling standards. That said, yes, something along these lines seems necessary. Even automated curtailment by last-link telcos (e.g., your own telco) based on rejection / complaint rates (e.g., recpients reporting calls as spam) could be A Thing, and are not dissimilar to how email spam management occurs today. Making that the peer's problem incentivises them to clean up their acts.
- monkpit 4y agoThis is an honest question: how do they (the FCC, et al) know the responsible parties but they haven’t stopped them?
- bediger4000 4y agoToo much money to be made in Robocall scams.
- ta988 4y agoIndeed they are close to 95% of the calls I receive.
- saxonww 4y agoWhat's especially crazy is that these guys have been on the radar already, for a long time. https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/092-3193-castle-rock-capital-management-inc https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/0... https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/152-3152-x170013-aaron-michael-jones https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/1... Yes, the FTC, not the FCC, but look. Roy Cox settled and was permanently enjoined from telemarketing. Aaron Jones apparently just ignored the complaint altogether, and the FTC won a default judgment banning him from telemarketing also. Yet, here we are again with both of them allegedly involved in this scamming. Maybe the car warranty calls are not considered telemarketing?
- ne0flex 4y agoThis is what I'm wondering. I often get auto warranty calls and I don't even own a vehicle. I just assumed that the calls were spoofed or were illegal in some sense.
- wahern 4y agoTherein laws a potential flaw in those assuming that the solution can be found in plugging personal information leaks. Just like with e-mail, many (most?) of these scams aren't targeted. If the scam has no relevance, people ignore and readily forget it about. For those for whom the scam is pertinent (and that can be a large fraction of the population at any one moment), it seems like the scammer knew something personal about them. The salience may be purely in the mind of of the potential victim; the scammer is often just blasting out the same crap to everybody. I can't even count how many Chinese-language robocalls I've received, for example, and I neither speak Chinese nor could anyone have reason to believe I do (and in any event, such calls are a common experience, AFAIU). I mean, most scams work similarly to this. Fortune telling, for example. The scammer relies to some degree on the victim connecting the dots themselves as the scammer lacks the necessary information. This is just especially true when it comes to spam.
- kleinsch 4y agoCool, let's do the solar panel scammers next. I still get multiple calls/week for California solar energy, despite moving out of state two years ago.
- betwixthewires 4y agoDude I get calls to install solar on a house I rented a decade ago for 2 years.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- unsignedint 4y agoConsidering I'm getting those calls regularly, I wish there are practical way to set up a paywall for incoming calls to deter those. Like, what if we could set up a system where they have to pay 25c tolls on incoming calls, and they only get waived if it is indeed a legitimate call, indicated by the receiving party...
- aaaaaaaaata 4y agoThis used to be called "the phone system".
- unsignedint 4y agoSelective billing, though? I know in some countries callers pay for all outbounds but I don't think it was all possible unless one would set up those premium rate numbers...
- caramelcustard 4y agoAlternative title: FCC brings an end to an internet meme.
- Arubis 4y agoRight move, too late. Everyone I know has largely abandoned the possibility of answering unknown numbers.
- metadat 4y agoYou never know when it might be a friend or relative calling from jail or a mental health facility. I tend to answer even still.
- Arubis 4y agoThis is true, and a great reason we should have treated the destruction of trust in the telephone system as the public health threat that it is. I tend not to answer, because it is _always_ an unwelcome interruption.
- lokar 4y agoThe pixel call screen works pretty well
- shrimp_emoji 4y agoThey should use Discord on their phones or no lol Using an ancient vestigial telecommunications system as your lifeline is your problem.
- betwixthewires 4y agoWhile I agree with you, some proprietary closed communications channel controlled by a corporation that mines data for advertisers is worse. I think ideally people should use something like xmpp or email.
- is0tope 4y agoYes I'm sure they can quickly log on to discord from jail.
- metadat 4y agoPrison and mental health facilities don't let you have a cell phone, period. Longtime friend called me from one of these places yesterday. I answered only out of common courtesy, fully expecting a robocall.
- WWLink 4y agoHow dare they overstep their bounds and hurt small businesses!!! /s
- bluSCALE4 4y agoI actually don't mind the robocalls as much as I used to. What pisses me off now is the random text messages of people pretending to know me on WhatsApp and SMS.
- betaby 4y agoThat how it works https://maxread.substack.com/p/whats-the-deal-with-all-those-weird https://maxread.substack.com/p/whats-the-deal-with-all-those...
- dredmorbius 4y agoAlso discussed on HN about a week ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31949731 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31949731
- andrew_ 4y agoGreat news. Now tackle "real estate opportunity" and "off market" robocalls. I get two dozen of them a day, for which I thank TMobile for filtering out most.
- jbritton 4y agoI want more than the calls stopped. I want a fine of at least 8 billion calls times the legal $500 per call fine plus treble damages. The money distributed to everyone with a phone. I also want to pierce the corporate veil and take everything the owning operators have. Then I want the same done to all robo callers.
- hun3 4y ago> distributed to everyone with a phone and the carrier, to boost the incentive?
- ncmncm 4y agoNo. Collect the money from the carriers. Let them try to collect from the spammers. Incentive.
- seanp2k2 4y agoYeah, the fact that a handful of individuals are allowed to make this much infrastructure effectively useless for hundreds of millions of people just so they can make their own millions of dollars from their scams is insane. Maybe someone could start their own robocall campaign urging everyone sick of scam calls to donate $1 to a crypto assassination fund.
- betwixthewires 4y agoI like the calls, because they highlight the shortcomings of the telephony protocol that has been strapped to the side of communications technologies with box tape and is a bunch of legacy system compatibility layers glued together. Telephone numbers are stupid. An arbitrary sequence of digits, area codes, they only really serve as unique identifiers like a social security number, I can easily be contacted by anyone even if I don't want to be. They're technically inferior. I only need one because other people I don't really care to interact with need me to need one. The only reason I even have one is because it comes free with my mobile data plan. Who are these people that answer the phone for numbers not in their contacts anyway? Or check voicemail? If someone wants to get a hold of you via your phone number and you actually want to speak to them, they'll SMS. I don't even like that, but at least it's better. Just ask me for a fucking email address so I can communicate asynchronously, I also have a few other contact mechanisms and if I want to talk to you I'll give you information you need to contact me that way.
- testbjjl 4y ago> Who are these people that answer the phone for numbers not in their contacts anyway? Or check voicemail? If someone wants to get a hold of you via your phone number and you actually want to speak to them, they'll SMS. Sorry, but I am glad you’re not on the board of the FCC. While I do get spam VM, usually less that 5 seconds in length that doesn’t get converted to text, I still get a lot of VM from friends and family that gets converted to text, awkwardly which I read a listen to if necessary.
- filoeleven 4y ago> FCC Enforcement Bureau notifies all U.S.-based telecommunications providers they may block auto warranty robocalls originating from a robocalling enterprise led by Roy Cox, Jr., Aaron Michael Jones, their individual associates, and associated entities may block. That sounds pretty weak to me. Is there some reason telcos couldn’t block them before?
- zugi 4y ago> Is there some reason telcos couldn’t block them before? Yes, the FCC normally requires carriers to put all calls through. So the FCC is only now, very belatedly and in very limited circumstances, allowing deviations from the FCC's own rules that have prevented carriers from stopping robocalls for all these years.
- aaaaaaaaata 4y agoPeering agreements.