3 ms·
If they got rid of marketplace sellers and actually got control over their supply chain then they might actually go up in people's opinion. However Amazon and
by iasay 4y ago
If they got rid of marketplace sellers and actually got control over their supply chain then they might actually go up in people's opinion.
However Amazon and AWS isn't about doing a good job, it's about doing a mediocre job and making everyone happy though apologies.
And that's why I'm still using them. They are a good balance.
- themitigating 4y agoWhat does aws have to do with this article, piracy, or the retail side of Amazon
- iasay 4y agoThe same soulless automation running the show.
- hourago 4y agoThat is going to be the fight of the next generation. Inappropriate videos on YouTube for kids, extremist propaganda in Facebook or fake products in Amazon all have that soulless automation as main culprit. (Let's not talk about Roblox) Cost goes against resilience and quality. You can automate things to a limit until everything breaks down.
- themitigating 4y agoWhom?
- __mharrison__ 4y agoNot sure why enabling piracy is a good balance. Care to expound on that?
- warkdarrior 4y agoInformation just wants to be free, even if you call it "piracy."
- __mharrison__ 4y agoI assume that you are a programmer and from your response you write only open source code ... for free.
- notpushkin 4y agoThis analogy doesn't really hold here – programmers are usually paid to write some code that doesn't yet exist. You can write it as open source, too – if your contract allows this (e. g. https://commonform.org/switchmode/switchmode/3.0.1 https://commonform.org/switchmode/switchmode/3.0.1; although more often it's an informal agreement that your employer will open source the work in question).
- copperx 4y agoOh, so that's why they don't have balance caps in AWS? It's true that apologies are a good balance.