4 ms·

I think a more relevant take is "how are they going to accomplish this with only $50 million? California can't even build high speed rail with a budget in 10s

I think a more relevant take is "how are they going to accomplish this with only $50 million? California can't even build high speed rail with a budget in 10s of billions of dollars and more than a decade of time.

j16sdiz 4y ago
This is just building one plant in one nebourhood. High speed rail involve lots more private land use and local regulations.
SubjectToChange 4y ago
And what exactly is the proper amount of time and money for California high speed rail? I doubt you can give an answer that isn't practically bullshit.
- nradov 4y ago
  The proper amount of money would be $40B, as per the original promises by project proponents.
david38 4y ago
Spoken like someone who is either a parroting shill or actually doesn’t understand the first thing about comparing two projects.