4 ms·
Hmm. Just a crazy idea. What if nobody went around beheading people for insulting their prophet, AND nobody went around arresting people for insulting their dei
by Hizonner 4y ago
Hmm. Just a crazy idea. What if nobody went around beheading people for insulting their prophet, AND nobody went around arresting people for insulting their deity? And what if both the beheadings and the bogus arrests were punished by law? And what if nobody were allowed to get away with trying to use either one to justify the other?
I mean, I'm not sure a guy who's been dead for 1200 years AND supposedly has the favor of God needs any protecting, but I'm also not sure than any actual gods are in a lot of need of protecting.
Not that either arrest or beheading would be an appropriate response to an insult to an actually living and vulnerable person, either.
- boruto 4y agoTechnically he isn't arrested for insulting diety. But I dont support his arrest, It's just stupid that process is the punishment.
- bipulranjan 4y agoIt is not an crazy idea and that is what is being practised in India. In fact, India does not have any blashphemy law. We do have section 295A (https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1803184/ https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1803184/). The atmosphere become highly polarized after Md. Zubair selectively amplified the outrageous comment on social media. He even translated the video in Arabic for middle-east countries to take note. He rejoiced on twitter when the Islamic nations was summoning Indian ambassadors and Indian product was being boycotted. If you are going at that length to malign image of any country then certainly people have right to demand legal action against your mischief.