> There is nothing to "believe in" in science anyway, because it's an exposer of non-truth. Trusting that the methodology leads to truth is the belief part of

> There is nothing to "believe in" in science anyway, because it's an exposer of non-truth. Trusting that the methodology leads to truth is the belief part of science. Someone has to frame "the truth" as some functional model and that gives them immense power to influence, just like any clergy.