3 ms·
If you define "rich and developed" as NATO+Japan then that's more than a billion people. Forcing that many people to reduce CO2 emissions to third world standar
by sbierwagen 4y ago
If you define "rich and developed" as NATO+Japan then that's more than a billion people. Forcing that many people to reduce CO2 emissions to third world standards wouldn't require a "yank of the steering wheel", it would need nuclear war.
- actionfromafar 4y agoSo, you are saying there is still hope?
- shepherdjerred 4y agoAre you saying nuclear war is preferable to climate change? What exactly is your definition of good? It sure isn’t the well-being of humanity or the planet.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- imtringued 4y agoHe is asking if psychology is the only blocker.