11 ms·

Winamp for Mac

114 points by drewda 15y ago

vito 15y ago
Looks promising, but very basic so far. No shuffle/repeat, enqueueing, or really anything beyond play, pause, previous, and next. It did import my iTunes library in <2 seconds though, which seems impressive compared to iTunes', what, 15 minutes? Excited to see a hopefully serious competitor to iTunes, it's actually great to see them starting simple. What's there works well.
- sirn 15y ago
  To be fair, Winamp "import" seems to only read iTunes Library (XML file) rather than rescanning the whole library. FEATURES - Import from iTunes Library (XML) or music files from specified Watch Folders
- justinhj 15y ago
  I really like vlc, since it works on windows and mac flawlessly, as well as playing video
- gchucky 15y ago
  I just started using Songbird on my Mac at work, and I'm actually pretty happy with it. The interface is pretty close to iTunes, for what it's worth, but it integrates with all sorts of other things. Not really sure if it's a serious competitor to iTunes, though..
- natesm 15y ago
  Keep in mind that iTunes had already done the hard work for Winamp. iTunes has to walk your directory structure, open each file, and read the ID3 tags. That takes real, actual time, especially on a spinning disk. iTunes is probably slower than it has to be, but there is a limit on how fast that sort of thing can be. Parsing a single XML file takes a lot less time. It took a lot longer than 2 seconds for me as well - about 16k songs.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
- oldpatricka 15y ago
  I don't think Justin Frankel has worked for Winamp for some time. He's over at Cockos these days.
  - drewda 15y ago
    "Frankel announced his resignation from AOL on January 22, 2004 on his weblog, stating 'Won't repeat it here (in two words: I've resigned). So begins chapter 3... or something cliché/poetic there. Or wait, does I've count as a single word? ha ha.'"* * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Frankel#AOL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Frankel#AOL
  - kitsune_ 15y ago
    He actually founded Cockos. Reaper is great.
rprime 15y ago
I like you they underlined the Android part, why take on iPhone, that's dominated by iTunes when there's such a great market for Android.
zyang 15y ago
Shouldn't it be called Macamp?
- uptown 15y ago
  Don't mess with an established brand. This lesson brought to you by Qwikster.
  - mirkules 15y ago
    There used to be a version called MacAmp, back around the 2000s. Back then, it resembled the current windows version 2.7-something. I haven't tried installing it, but here's the link for MacAmp. http://www.macamplite.com/ http://www.macamplite.com/
- pennig 15y ago
  It's like how TCBY used to be "The Country's Best Yogurt" but is now "This Can't Be Yogurt." Win now stands for the-opposite-of-lose, instead of Windows.
  - gchucky 15y ago
    According to Wikipedia, you have it reversed: TCBY currently stands for "The Country's Best Yogurt"; "This Can't Be Yogurt" is a former name.
    - pennig 15y ago
      Well I'll be monkey's uncle.
parbo 15y ago
All of these features are also available in Spotify. Oh, and streaming too!
glhaynes 15y ago
I'm gonna skin it to look like iTunes for Windows.
- TobbenTM 15y ago
  Is there a major difference between iTunes for Windows and iTunes for Mac? (Don't use Mac OS X, sorry)
  - phillmv 15y ago
    They both provide crummy experiences, but the for Windows version manages to be crummier.
  - shinratdr 15y ago
    iTunes for Mac is a great music player/jukebox. The Windows version is slower, buggier and less responsive. As a result, it's a pretty bad library based music player in Windows (although nowhere close to as bad as people make it out to be). iOS device management is as flaky on Windows as it is on Mac OS X, which is what they have in common and one of the most frequent complaints. But to be fair, nothing besides iTunes even tries to do device management as comprehensively, so there is little to compare it to. Still, it can be buggy and slow and that is easy to judge even with nothing to directly compare it to. IMO iTunes gets an excessive amount of over the top flak from techie types. As someone who has used it since version one in Mac OS 9, it's really not that bad. I'm quite picky about my applications and I've been using it every day for around 10 years now. I always check out alternatives when they come up for OS X and they are always much worse in very simple areas, like scrolling. Go ahead, grab almost any alternative music player for OS X and throw in a 20k song library. If it scrolls as smoothly as iTunes, I'll be amazed.
    - TobbenTM 15y ago
      Good to know, but I was thinking more in the way of UI, as he said he wanted to skin it like the Windows version.
      - 15y ago
Mithrandir 15y ago
I remember Winamp; haven't used it in probably 7-8 years. I gave it up for RealPlayer (which I couldn't stand) and eventually VLC. Anyone here know the main advantages/disadvantages between Winamp and VLC?
- pavel_lishin 15y ago
  > I gave it up for RealPlayer (which I couldn't stand) How come?
  - Mithrandir 15y ago
    Oh, the player repeatedly crashed and the Message Center pop-ups were annoying too, although I did eventually disable them. Later, the proprietary license was a (no pun intended) real turn-off for me.
    - udp 15y ago
      But why did you switch to RealPlayer from Winamp?
      - thefreehunter 15y ago
        Because RealPlayer was better. And that's not saying much.
      - Mithrandir 15y ago
        Well, I wasn't a big music listener; I really used RP at first because its browser mode was the only browser on my WinME computer that worked. Then I started listening to music and browsing the web, and I thought 'I don't need Winamp! This program is cooler! It even has a dancing sheep!' After RealPlayer got on my nerves, and I got a new computer, I used Win Media Player instead and completely forgot about Winamp. :)
      - ajarmoniuk 15y ago
        I, for one, even bought a "real player gold" license. Ha!
blackguardx 15y ago
OS X has been a ghetto for music players for some time. If you dont't like iTunes, you don't really have many good options. Hopefully this will ignite some more competition in that space.
- simonbrown 15y ago
  VLC has a Mac version. I don't know how good it is, though.
  - xenophanes 15y ago
    It's fine apart from occasionally crashing, usually when you open a video or skip around. Generally better than quicktime for watching videos.
    - X-Istence 15y ago
      Install Perian to add more codec support to Quicktime. I've found that sometimes Quicktime works better than VLC when using Perian.
      - xenophanes 15y ago
        I have Perian but quicktime lacks VLC's hotkeys for jumping forward/backward and has much worse control over playback speed. Quicktime 7 also, FWIW, lies about what playback speed it is using. You can drag the slider and then time it and it doesn't play at the speed it's supposed to.
        hexley 15y ago
        j,k,l under QT 7 control playback speed.
  - ugh 15y ago
    Well, VLC isn’t really comparable with iTunes. That’s like comparing Lightroom with Photoshop.
natesm 15y ago
As far as I can tell, it's mostly just an ugly version of iTunes. * Visuals aside, the UI is basically iTunes. It has the exact same elements in the exact same places, except Winamp looks like a tacky GTK+ theme. * I couldn't figure out how to hide "Genre", which I strongly dislike, and "Year", which I don't care about. * No fullscreen on Lion - this takes, literally, 5 minutes to add. I guess they would have to spend some time drawing a completely custom button. * The largest UI element is the number of seconds that have elapsed in the current song. Is this really something that people care about? * Sorting by artist seems to be broken - if I sort by artist, it should logically order each artist's albums alphabetically as well. I'm not sure what secondary ordering its actually using - it's not alphabetical by track or ordered by track number (all 1, all 2, ...). iTunes calls the manner of sorting that I suggest "album by artist". * Scrolling is broken (not smooth). This is also an issue in Spotify. * For some reason there is a prominent button to show the "About" dialog. Good things: * When the track changes, this list doesn't snap back to the new song. This is one of the most annoying features in iTunes. * When the track changes, if you have searched for something, it doesn't just stop like iTunes. In iTunes, if you start playing a Beatles song, then search for "The Clash", if that Beatles song ends, it will not go to the next Beatles song, because the original song is no longer visible. * Watch folders, which, if it wasn't ugly, would be reason enough to use it.
- buro9 15y ago
  Yeah, but does it play FLAC? That would seal it for me. I use Fidelia at the moment, but the library is appalling and loading and scanning is just broken on large collections. If WinAmp only provides scanning of large collections, a basic library and FLAC support I'm going to be happy.
  - asymmetric 15y ago
    what about cog[1]? [1]: http://cogx.org/ http://cogx.org/
    - buro9 15y ago
      No good with large collections. All I want is it to load meta-data for 85,000 FLAC files, and allow me to search in a split-second, and then play an album. Oh, and it has to support 24bit FLAC too. I don't use playlists, I don't care about UI so much. At home I use a Squeezebox Transporter. Works brilliantly. But in a desktop player WinAmp is the only thing I've found that can scan and handle the collection, and than search it fast. So I run that in a VM. I realise I'm an edge case, but WinAmp for Mac looks like it fits my need.
ericdykstra 15y ago
Awesome; will download as soon as last.fm supports it. In my (albeit limited) search for a music player on OS X, iTunes is the best last.fm supported music player available, which is unfortunate because iTunes blows.
- wazoox 15y ago
  SongBird supports LastFM perfectly, doesn't take 15 minutes to boot, and doesn't come with annoying storefront, ping and other stuff I don't want to see. You should give it a try.
nodesocket 15y ago
Ahhh Winamp... Brings back to the days of Napster. I like to call them, the glory days of music.
- j79 15y ago
  I remember using Winamp even before Napster! 1997, I think? The first version with the basic look. I remember my machine was so old that the mp3 I downloaded wouldn't play at the full bitrate. Instead, it played at 64kbps. I remembered thinking how "crappy" mp3s sounded and was lost why everyone thought they were so great. When I finally upgraded (shortly after), my music world completely changed. Ended up buying a Rio PMP300. Amazing how far we've come.
  - ajarmoniuk 15y ago
    Rio was tad expensive... but it was so light compared to a discman...
- kapilkale 15y ago
  There's a delightful amount of irony in the title "Winamp for Mac"
- jefft 15y ago
  And Justin Frankel. He and his peeps at Nullsoft cranked out some great stuff
- vandahm 15y ago
  It really whips the llama's ass! Back in 1997, I had a massive 2 GB collection of MP3s. Edit: The best part was having to sort everything into 45-minute playlists so I could run a cable from my computer's sound card to a tape recorder to make mix tapes for my car.
rednaught 15y ago
Is there an equivalent of foobar2000 for Mac? The only player I've used on a regular basis on Mac is Vox ( http://www.voxapp.didgeroo.com/ http://www.voxapp.didgeroo.com/ ).
psychic_gibbon 15y ago
Looks good. But all I want is a file system browser. Which I don't see? I'm using Clementine at the moment which has one.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
CJefferson 15y ago
The major benefit of this for me is the syncing with winamp for Android, which I find a very good player.
jazz 15y ago
"Why Winamp for Mac Is the Media Media Player for Android" Did I miss something?
scottmcleod 15y ago
Win..Maybe the Windows version can improve and I can finally sync my music.
hm2k 15y ago
Why?
netnichols 15y ago
Back when I was on Windows I believe my progression was: Real Jukebox > MusicMatch Jukebox > Winamp > Foobar2000 Remember the nosedive Winamp took after AOL bought them? But man, I loved how you could double click the Winamp title bar and it would collapse to this tiny little bar that you could snap to your taskbar.
- MatthewPhillips 15y ago
  MusicMatch had the best autotagger I've ever used. It's too bad Yahoo ruined a great player.
bitwize 15y ago
wait what I don't even If you already have a Mac, why would you want to use ANYTHING besides iTunes? Also, sync with Android? You've already got a Mac and an Android, you can't buy a bloody iPod?
- anonymoushn 15y ago
  iTunes is... amazingly bad. I was using foobar2000 in wine for a while, but the terrible interaction between X11 apps and spaces got me to switch back to iTunes. I'll probably opt for a CLI solution in the near future.
  - chrishenn 15y ago
    MPD with ncmpcpp is nice and straight to the point. MPD is available through homebrew.
m0wfo 15y ago
Cool story bro! I forgot it's still 1999.
xenophanes 15y ago
What is wrong with the piece of crap! I used to use winamp a long time ago. Now it just doesn't work. I tried to play an avi. No. They're all greyed out. I tried dragging an mp3 into it. No. Tried dragging mp3 onto the dock icon. Looks like it's working but then nothing happens. Tried Open File with the mp3 (cmd-L for some reason...) and it lets me pick the mp3 then nothing happens, it doesn't play it or show up on the playlist. I give up. On a related note, I saw some screenshots and the windows version now has a bloated, horrible UI, not at all how I remember it.
- unfasten 15y ago
  > On a related note, I saw some screenshots and the windows version now has a bloated, horrible UI, not at all how I remember it. That's probably one of the 'Modern' skins. The 'Classic' skins (from v2.x) still work the same. Windowshade mode is still there and one of my absolute favorite features (most modern skins can't even get this right, let alone other audio players). Each section is still a separate, movable window (player, playlist, equalizer, media library, etc). Here's my Winamp, currently sitting at the top of my second monitor: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/24903613/hn-winamp.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/24903613/hn-winamp.png
- listic 15y ago
  Here's how it looks for me on Windows XP. It's the classic Winamp skin, the one that has been there for ages. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_1.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_1.png Full version, when I turn on the playlist and equalizer. I turn equalizer on just for symmetry; I never actually use it because I'm sorta audiophile and Equalizer Never Helps. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_2.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_2.png This I see more often; just the main window without additional windows. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_3.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_3.png Often I minimize it to a slim bar like this. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_3b.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_3b.png Or like this, if you turned on the playlist. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_4.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_4.png This I see even more; Winamp is minimized to a tray icon (the grey "play" icon)
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
ImprovedSilence 15y ago
OMG DREAMS DO COME TRUE!
ImprovedSilence 15y ago
Right now this seems to be depressingly sparse, for any music player. If this could get some of the old 2.x basic winamp functionality (shuffle/repeat, support OLD SCHOOL SKINS, and, most importantly, be able to queue up files(my biggest biggest biggest pet peeve against iTunes)) I would ecstatic. I'm gonna be honest, ever since leaving windows, I was able to say, half joking, but being completely serious, that the biggest thing I missed about windows was winamp (yeah, I"m an old school hold out, but it worked soooo good, and my skin looked sooooo good, and it didnt take up too much space). This player doesn't do it for me, but it shows there is potential. I hope.
jgh 15y ago
Too bad they didn't port WinAmp 2.x to Mac :(
- listic 15y ago
  Are there any ways in which 5.x can't be just like 2.x ?
richtaur 15y ago
I love me some Winamp. Since switching to a Mac, it's one of only a few apps that I miss terribly. But if it doesn't support the media controls on a Mac keyboard, it just cannot compete with iTunes. Period.
rickdale 15y ago
Winamp, it really whips the llama's ass
meemo 15y ago
They got the basics right. It's a great start.
billpatrianakos 15y ago
Too little too late. I wish they had this when I got my first Mac. Winamp was the shit when I was a kid and I have a fondness for it out of nostalgia but I don't see anything special here unfortunately.
zephjc 15y ago
It's finally come full circle I guess: WinAmp's UI(1) was copied by SoundJam MP for the Mac(2) circa 1999. Apple bought SoundJam and turned it into iTunes after overhauling the UI(3) leading to what we have today(4), only to be copied by WinAmp as we see in the OP. 1) http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2005/04/16/winamp.gif http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2005/04/16/w... 2) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e4/Soundjammp.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e4/Soundjammp.jpg 3) http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/09/itunes1.jpg http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/09/itunes1.jp... 4) http://cdn.macrumors.com/article-new/2011/06/itunes_10_5.jpg http://cdn.macrumors.com/article-new/2011/06/itunes_10_5.jpg
jmillage 15y ago
I'll be honest. I just downloaded it so I could hear that classic app intro - "it really whips the llama's ass"
ZipCordManiac 15y ago
This runs great. Unlike iTunes it doesn't check my entire damn music library on the NAS every single time or have tons of bloatware like Ping, iTunes Store, etc. iTunes took on average 3-5 minutes just to start. This starts quickly and immediately loads my music. If it gets updated with some decent features I'd use it exclusively. Another solution people might be interested in is Clementine. http://code.google.com/p/clementine-player/ http://code.google.com/p/clementine-player/
- mortenjorck 15y ago
  Something has to be timing out with your network share. I have a library tens of gigabytes in size and a three-year-old MacBook Pro, and it the app starts in about five seconds. iTunes is bloated; I won't argue with that—but it's definitely not slow.
senthilnayagam 15y ago
I welcome Winamp on OSX , I first used Winamp in 1997-98 and it was liberating in many senses, mp3 could be ripped or downloaded and can build playlists, and later they brought plugins for visualization and DSP. I am not a iTunes fan, it is more of a necessary evil, as I have many Mac and iOS devices.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
wazoox 15y ago
i'm using SongBird, and it's quite nice. It reads most formats, sorts songs correctly, sync (though not wirelessly) to about anything. It's more feature complete than this (shuffle, repeat, playlists, lastFM connection, video, etc) and it's open source (yes, that's quite important a feature to me).
egypturnash 15y ago
Three-second review: Wow, this would be really great if I was still a twelve-year-old boy who thinks that white text on a black background is the bee's knees. Also that twelve-year-old boy would probably have to not be used to playing all of his music out of a few Smart Playlists. Not that I've downloaded and tried Winamp but I am guessing it doesn't do those because no "iTunes alternative" has ever had that. But I guess the people who actually spend a lot of time looking at their music player will like this because it can import the awesome skin with a hot anime babe on it that they had to abandon when they switched to a Mac? I guess. I dunno, iTunes spends 99% of its time on my machine hidden, being controlled by Quicksilver hotkeys, and telling me what's playing via Growl alerts.
- CJefferson 15y ago
  Just wanted to say, your comment is not very useful. You admit that you haven't downloaded it, yet write a lengthy "review". If you had downloaded it, you would know it has no skin support.
  - egypturnash 15y ago
    You must live deep in the land of tl;dr if five sentences is "lengthy". But thanks for correcting my speculation. Wow. No skin support? That seemed to be one of the killer features of Winamp judging from all the screenshots I used to see. I guess the "killer" feature is "moves music between iTunes and your Android phone", which I've been happily using Salling Media Sync for ever since I got a N1.
tomc1985 15y ago
Why couldn't they have just ported the Winamp core and its playback plugins over to Mac? What the hell is this crap?
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
sabret00the 15y ago
I wish they'd sort out the Windows version before they moved on to sorting out other platforms, but I can understand why. I wrote about my gripes with Winamp a couple of times: http://s00techified.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/soo-what-happened-to-winamp/ http://s00techified.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/soo-what-happen... http://s00techified.wordpress.com/2011/07/11/soo-alternatives-to-winamp-someone-mentioned-songbird/ http://s00techified.wordpress.com/2011/07/11/soo-alternative...
jamesrcole 15y ago
Winamp with the Bento skin, and the 'Local media -> audio' pane open is far better than any player I've come across on the Mac.. I'm really hoping the Mac version gets as good as the Windows version. The 'Local media -> audio' pane makes it really quick and easy to browse music by genre or artist, and if you rate your songs, your top songs, or top songs by genre or artist. And the window-shade mode is nice for letting you see what's playing and controlling with minimal distraction and taking up minimal space. I've really missed it since switching to a Mac.
mvkel 15y ago
The only reason I'd want Winamp on my Mac is for its ridiculously low resource usage. If they're going to make it look, act, and EAT like iTunes, why switch?
gahhhh 15y ago
Why do all these people talk about Winamp like if it was the best player for windows? Sonique was WAY better, back in the day. Winamp was for the kids who didn't know any better.

114 points by drewda 15y ago

vito 15y ago

Looks promising, but very basic so far. No shuffle/repeat, enqueueing, or really anything beyond play, pause, previous, and next. It did import my iTunes library in <2 seconds though, which seems impressive compared to iTunes', what, 15 minutes? Excited to see a hopefully serious competitor to iTunes, it's actually great to see them starting simple. What's there works well.

sirn 15y ago
To be fair, Winamp "import" seems to only read iTunes Library (XML file) rather than rescanning the whole library. FEATURES - Import from iTunes Library (XML) or music files from specified Watch Folders
justinhj 15y ago
I really like vlc, since it works on windows and mac flawlessly, as well as playing video
gchucky 15y ago
I just started using Songbird on my Mac at work, and I'm actually pretty happy with it. The interface is pretty close to iTunes, for what it's worth, but it integrates with all sorts of other things. Not really sure if it's a serious competitor to iTunes, though..
natesm 15y ago
Keep in mind that iTunes had already done the hard work for Winamp. iTunes has to walk your directory structure, open each file, and read the ID3 tags. That takes real, actual time, especially on a spinning disk. iTunes is probably slower than it has to be, but there is a limit on how fast that sort of thing can be. Parsing a single XML file takes a lot less time. It took a lot longer than 2 seconds for me as well - about 16k songs.

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

oldpatricka 15y ago
I don't think Justin Frankel has worked for Winamp for some time. He's over at Cockos these days.
- drewda 15y ago
  "Frankel announced his resignation from AOL on January 22, 2004 on his weblog, stating 'Won't repeat it here (in two words: I've resigned). So begins chapter 3... or something cliché/poetic there. Or wait, does I've count as a single word? ha ha.'"* * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Frankel#AOL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Frankel#AOL
- kitsune_ 15y ago
  He actually founded Cockos. Reaper is great.

rprime 15y ago

I like you they underlined the Android part, why take on iPhone, that's dominated by iTunes when there's such a great market for Android.

zyang 15y ago

Shouldn't it be called Macamp?

uptown 15y ago
Don't mess with an established brand. This lesson brought to you by Qwikster.
- mirkules 15y ago
  There used to be a version called MacAmp, back around the 2000s. Back then, it resembled the current windows version 2.7-something. I haven't tried installing it, but here's the link for MacAmp. http://www.macamplite.com/ http://www.macamplite.com/
pennig 15y ago
It's like how TCBY used to be "The Country's Best Yogurt" but is now "This Can't Be Yogurt." Win now stands for the-opposite-of-lose, instead of Windows.
- gchucky 15y ago
  According to Wikipedia, you have it reversed: TCBY currently stands for "The Country's Best Yogurt"; "This Can't Be Yogurt" is a former name.
  - pennig 15y ago
    Well I'll be monkey's uncle.

parbo 15y ago

All of these features are also available in Spotify. Oh, and streaming too!

glhaynes 15y ago

I'm gonna skin it to look like iTunes for Windows.

TobbenTM 15y ago
Is there a major difference between iTunes for Windows and iTunes for Mac? (Don't use Mac OS X, sorry)
- phillmv 15y ago
  They both provide crummy experiences, but the for Windows version manages to be crummier.
- shinratdr 15y ago
  iTunes for Mac is a great music player/jukebox. The Windows version is slower, buggier and less responsive. As a result, it's a pretty bad library based music player in Windows (although nowhere close to as bad as people make it out to be). iOS device management is as flaky on Windows as it is on Mac OS X, which is what they have in common and one of the most frequent complaints. But to be fair, nothing besides iTunes even tries to do device management as comprehensively, so there is little to compare it to. Still, it can be buggy and slow and that is easy to judge even with nothing to directly compare it to. IMO iTunes gets an excessive amount of over the top flak from techie types. As someone who has used it since version one in Mac OS 9, it's really not that bad. I'm quite picky about my applications and I've been using it every day for around 10 years now. I always check out alternatives when they come up for OS X and they are always much worse in very simple areas, like scrolling. Go ahead, grab almost any alternative music player for OS X and throw in a 20k song library. If it scrolls as smoothly as iTunes, I'll be amazed.
  - TobbenTM 15y ago
    Good to know, but I was thinking more in the way of UI, as he said he wanted to skin it like the Windows version.
    - 15y ago

Mithrandir 15y ago

I remember Winamp; haven't used it in probably 7-8 years. I gave it up for RealPlayer (which I couldn't stand) and eventually VLC. Anyone here know the main advantages/disadvantages between Winamp and VLC?

pavel_lishin 15y ago
> I gave it up for RealPlayer (which I couldn't stand) How come?
- Mithrandir 15y ago
  Oh, the player repeatedly crashed and the Message Center pop-ups were annoying too, although I did eventually disable them. Later, the proprietary license was a (no pun intended) real turn-off for me.
  - udp 15y ago
    But why did you switch to RealPlayer from Winamp?
    - thefreehunter 15y ago
      Because RealPlayer was better. And that's not saying much.
    - Mithrandir 15y ago
      Well, I wasn't a big music listener; I really used RP at first because its browser mode was the only browser on my WinME computer that worked. Then I started listening to music and browsing the web, and I thought 'I don't need Winamp! This program is cooler! It even has a dancing sheep!' After RealPlayer got on my nerves, and I got a new computer, I used Win Media Player instead and completely forgot about Winamp. :)
    - ajarmoniuk 15y ago
      I, for one, even bought a "real player gold" license. Ha!

blackguardx 15y ago

OS X has been a ghetto for music players for some time. If you dont't like iTunes, you don't really have many good options. Hopefully this will ignite some more competition in that space.

simonbrown 15y ago
VLC has a Mac version. I don't know how good it is, though.
- xenophanes 15y ago
  It's fine apart from occasionally crashing, usually when you open a video or skip around. Generally better than quicktime for watching videos.
  - X-Istence 15y ago
    Install Perian to add more codec support to Quicktime. I've found that sometimes Quicktime works better than VLC when using Perian.
    - xenophanes 15y ago
      I have Perian but quicktime lacks VLC's hotkeys for jumping forward/backward and has much worse control over playback speed. Quicktime 7 also, FWIW, lies about what playback speed it is using. You can drag the slider and then time it and it doesn't play at the speed it's supposed to.
      - hexley 15y ago
        j,k,l under QT 7 control playback speed.
- ugh 15y ago
  Well, VLC isn’t really comparable with iTunes. That’s like comparing Lightroom with Photoshop.

natesm 15y ago

As far as I can tell, it's mostly just an ugly version of iTunes. * Visuals aside, the UI is basically iTunes. It has the exact same elements in the exact same places, except Winamp looks like a tacky GTK+ theme. * I couldn't figure out how to hide "Genre", which I strongly dislike, and "Year", which I don't care about. * No fullscreen on Lion - this takes, literally, 5 minutes to add. I guess they would have to spend some time drawing a completely custom button. * The largest UI element is the number of seconds that have elapsed in the current song. Is this really something that people care about? * Sorting by artist seems to be broken - if I sort by artist, it should logically order each artist's albums alphabetically as well. I'm not sure what secondary ordering its actually using - it's not alphabetical by track or ordered by track number (all 1, all 2, ...). iTunes calls the manner of sorting that I suggest "album by artist". * Scrolling is broken (not smooth). This is also an issue in Spotify. * For some reason there is a prominent button to show the "About" dialog. Good things: * When the track changes, this list doesn't snap back to the new song. This is one of the most annoying features in iTunes. * When the track changes, if you have searched for something, it doesn't just stop like iTunes. In iTunes, if you start playing a Beatles song, then search for "The Clash", if that Beatles song ends, it will not go to the next Beatles song, because the original song is no longer visible. * Watch folders, which, if it wasn't ugly, would be reason enough to use it.

buro9 15y ago
Yeah, but does it play FLAC? That would seal it for me. I use Fidelia at the moment, but the library is appalling and loading and scanning is just broken on large collections. If WinAmp only provides scanning of large collections, a basic library and FLAC support I'm going to be happy.
- asymmetric 15y ago
  what about cog[1]? [1]: http://cogx.org/ http://cogx.org/
  - buro9 15y ago
    No good with large collections. All I want is it to load meta-data for 85,000 FLAC files, and allow me to search in a split-second, and then play an album. Oh, and it has to support 24bit FLAC too. I don't use playlists, I don't care about UI so much. At home I use a Squeezebox Transporter. Works brilliantly. But in a desktop player WinAmp is the only thing I've found that can scan and handle the collection, and than search it fast. So I run that in a VM. I realise I'm an edge case, but WinAmp for Mac looks like it fits my need.

ericdykstra 15y ago

Awesome; will download as soon as last.fm supports it. In my (albeit limited) search for a music player on OS X, iTunes is the best last.fm supported music player available, which is unfortunate because iTunes blows.

wazoox 15y ago
SongBird supports LastFM perfectly, doesn't take 15 minutes to boot, and doesn't come with annoying storefront, ping and other stuff I don't want to see. You should give it a try.

nodesocket 15y ago

Ahhh Winamp... Brings back to the days of Napster. I like to call them, the glory days of music.

j79 15y ago
I remember using Winamp even before Napster! 1997, I think? The first version with the basic look. I remember my machine was so old that the mp3 I downloaded wouldn't play at the full bitrate. Instead, it played at 64kbps. I remembered thinking how "crappy" mp3s sounded and was lost why everyone thought they were so great. When I finally upgraded (shortly after), my music world completely changed. Ended up buying a Rio PMP300. Amazing how far we've come.
- ajarmoniuk 15y ago
  Rio was tad expensive... but it was so light compared to a discman...
kapilkale 15y ago
There's a delightful amount of irony in the title "Winamp for Mac"
jefft 15y ago
And Justin Frankel. He and his peeps at Nullsoft cranked out some great stuff
vandahm 15y ago
It really whips the llama's ass! Back in 1997, I had a massive 2 GB collection of MP3s. Edit: The best part was having to sort everything into 45-minute playlists so I could run a cable from my computer's sound card to a tape recorder to make mix tapes for my car.

rednaught 15y ago

Is there an equivalent of foobar2000 for Mac? The only player I've used on a regular basis on Mac is Vox ( http://www.voxapp.didgeroo.com/ http://www.voxapp.didgeroo.com/ ).

psychic_gibbon 15y ago

Looks good. But all I want is a file system browser. Which I don't see? I'm using Clementine at the moment which has one.

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

CJefferson 15y ago

The major benefit of this for me is the syncing with winamp for Android, which I find a very good player.

jazz 15y ago

"Why Winamp for Mac Is the Media Media Player for Android" Did I miss something?

scottmcleod 15y ago

Win..Maybe the Windows version can improve and I can finally sync my music.

hm2k 15y ago

Why?

netnichols 15y ago

Back when I was on Windows I believe my progression was: Real Jukebox > MusicMatch Jukebox > Winamp > Foobar2000 Remember the nosedive Winamp took after AOL bought them? But man, I loved how you could double click the Winamp title bar and it would collapse to this tiny little bar that you could snap to your taskbar.

MatthewPhillips 15y ago
MusicMatch had the best autotagger I've ever used. It's too bad Yahoo ruined a great player.

bitwize 15y ago

wait what I don't even If you already have a Mac, why would you want to use ANYTHING besides iTunes? Also, sync with Android? You've already got a Mac and an Android, you can't buy a bloody iPod?

anonymoushn 15y ago
iTunes is... amazingly bad. I was using foobar2000 in wine for a while, but the terrible interaction between X11 apps and spaces got me to switch back to iTunes. I'll probably opt for a CLI solution in the near future.
- chrishenn 15y ago
  MPD with ncmpcpp is nice and straight to the point. MPD is available through homebrew.

m0wfo 15y ago

Cool story bro! I forgot it's still 1999.

xenophanes 15y ago

What is wrong with the piece of crap! I used to use winamp a long time ago. Now it just doesn't work. I tried to play an avi. No. They're all greyed out. I tried dragging an mp3 into it. No. Tried dragging mp3 onto the dock icon. Looks like it's working but then nothing happens. Tried Open File with the mp3 (cmd-L for some reason...) and it lets me pick the mp3 then nothing happens, it doesn't play it or show up on the playlist. I give up. On a related note, I saw some screenshots and the windows version now has a bloated, horrible UI, not at all how I remember it.

unfasten 15y ago
> On a related note, I saw some screenshots and the windows version now has a bloated, horrible UI, not at all how I remember it. That's probably one of the 'Modern' skins. The 'Classic' skins (from v2.x) still work the same. Windowshade mode is still there and one of my absolute favorite features (most modern skins can't even get this right, let alone other audio players). Each section is still a separate, movable window (player, playlist, equalizer, media library, etc). Here's my Winamp, currently sitting at the top of my second monitor: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/24903613/hn-winamp.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/24903613/hn-winamp.png
listic 15y ago
Here's how it looks for me on Windows XP. It's the classic Winamp skin, the one that has been there for ages. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_1.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_1.png Full version, when I turn on the playlist and equalizer. I turn equalizer on just for symmetry; I never actually use it because I'm sorta audiophile and Equalizer Never Helps. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_2.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_2.png This I see more often; just the main window without additional windows. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_3.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_3.png Often I minimize it to a slim bar like this. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_3b.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_3b.png Or like this, if you turned on the playlist. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_4.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/311095/Screenshots/winamp_4.png This I see even more; Winamp is minimized to a tray icon (the grey "play" icon)

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

ImprovedSilence 15y ago

OMG DREAMS DO COME TRUE!

ImprovedSilence 15y ago

Right now this seems to be depressingly sparse, for any music player. If this could get some of the old 2.x basic winamp functionality (shuffle/repeat, support OLD SCHOOL SKINS, and, most importantly, be able to queue up files(my biggest biggest biggest pet peeve against iTunes)) I would ecstatic. I'm gonna be honest, ever since leaving windows, I was able to say, half joking, but being completely serious, that the biggest thing I missed about windows was winamp (yeah, I"m an old school hold out, but it worked soooo good, and my skin looked sooooo good, and it didnt take up too much space). This player doesn't do it for me, but it shows there is potential. I hope.

jgh 15y ago

Too bad they didn't port WinAmp 2.x to Mac :(

listic 15y ago
Are there any ways in which 5.x can't be just like 2.x ?

richtaur 15y ago

I love me some Winamp. Since switching to a Mac, it's one of only a few apps that I miss terribly. But if it doesn't support the media controls on a Mac keyboard, it just cannot compete with iTunes. Period.

rickdale 15y ago

Winamp, it really whips the llama's ass

meemo 15y ago

They got the basics right. It's a great start.

billpatrianakos 15y ago

Too little too late. I wish they had this when I got my first Mac. Winamp was the shit when I was a kid and I have a fondness for it out of nostalgia but I don't see anything special here unfortunately.

zephjc 15y ago

It's finally come full circle I guess: WinAmp's UI(1) was copied by SoundJam MP for the Mac(2) circa 1999. Apple bought SoundJam and turned it into iTunes after overhauling the UI(3) leading to what we have today(4), only to be copied by WinAmp as we see in the OP. 1) http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2005/04/16/winamp.gif http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2005/04/16/w... 2) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e4/Soundjammp.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e4/Soundjammp.jpg 3) http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/09/itunes1.jpg http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tuaw.com/media/2006/09/itunes1.jp... 4) http://cdn.macrumors.com/article-new/2011/06/itunes_10_5.jpg http://cdn.macrumors.com/article-new/2011/06/itunes_10_5.jpg

jmillage 15y ago

I'll be honest. I just downloaded it so I could hear that classic app intro - "it really whips the llama's ass"

ZipCordManiac 15y ago

This runs great. Unlike iTunes it doesn't check my entire damn music library on the NAS every single time or have tons of bloatware like Ping, iTunes Store, etc. iTunes took on average 3-5 minutes just to start. This starts quickly and immediately loads my music. If it gets updated with some decent features I'd use it exclusively. Another solution people might be interested in is Clementine. http://code.google.com/p/clementine-player/ http://code.google.com/p/clementine-player/

mortenjorck 15y ago
Something has to be timing out with your network share. I have a library tens of gigabytes in size and a three-year-old MacBook Pro, and it the app starts in about five seconds. iTunes is bloated; I won't argue with that—but it's definitely not slow.

senthilnayagam 15y ago

I welcome Winamp on OSX , I first used Winamp in 1997-98 and it was liberating in many senses, mp3 could be ripped or downloaded and can build playlists, and later they brought plugins for visualization and DSP. I am not a iTunes fan, it is more of a necessary evil, as I have many Mac and iOS devices.

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

wazoox 15y ago

i'm using SongBird, and it's quite nice. It reads most formats, sorts songs correctly, sync (though not wirelessly) to about anything. It's more feature complete than this (shuffle, repeat, playlists, lastFM connection, video, etc) and it's open source (yes, that's quite important a feature to me).

egypturnash 15y ago

Three-second review: Wow, this would be really great if I was still a twelve-year-old boy who thinks that white text on a black background is the bee's knees. Also that twelve-year-old boy would probably have to not be used to playing all of his music out of a few Smart Playlists. Not that I've downloaded and tried Winamp but I am guessing it doesn't do those because no "iTunes alternative" has ever had that. But I guess the people who actually spend a lot of time looking at their music player will like this because it can import the awesome skin with a hot anime babe on it that they had to abandon when they switched to a Mac? I guess. I dunno, iTunes spends 99% of its time on my machine hidden, being controlled by Quicksilver hotkeys, and telling me what's playing via Growl alerts.

CJefferson 15y ago
Just wanted to say, your comment is not very useful. You admit that you haven't downloaded it, yet write a lengthy "review". If you had downloaded it, you would know it has no skin support.
- egypturnash 15y ago
  You must live deep in the land of tl;dr if five sentences is "lengthy". But thanks for correcting my speculation. Wow. No skin support? That seemed to be one of the killer features of Winamp judging from all the screenshots I used to see. I guess the "killer" feature is "moves music between iTunes and your Android phone", which I've been happily using Salling Media Sync for ever since I got a N1.

tomc1985 15y ago

Why couldn't they have just ported the Winamp core and its playback plugins over to Mac? What the hell is this crap?

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

sabret00the 15y ago

I wish they'd sort out the Windows version before they moved on to sorting out other platforms, but I can understand why. I wrote about my gripes with Winamp a couple of times: http://s00techified.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/soo-what-happened-to-winamp/ http://s00techified.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/soo-what-happen... http://s00techified.wordpress.com/2011/07/11/soo-alternatives-to-winamp-someone-mentioned-songbird/ http://s00techified.wordpress.com/2011/07/11/soo-alternative...

jamesrcole 15y ago

Winamp with the Bento skin, and the 'Local media -> audio' pane open is far better than any player I've come across on the Mac.. I'm really hoping the Mac version gets as good as the Windows version. The 'Local media -> audio' pane makes it really quick and easy to browse music by genre or artist, and if you rate your songs, your top songs, or top songs by genre or artist. And the window-shade mode is nice for letting you see what's playing and controlling with minimal distraction and taking up minimal space. I've really missed it since switching to a Mac.

mvkel 15y ago

The only reason I'd want Winamp on my Mac is for its ridiculously low resource usage. If they're going to make it look, act, and EAT like iTunes, why switch?

gahhhh 15y ago

Why do all these people talk about Winamp like if it was the best player for windows? Sonique was WAY better, back in the day. Winamp was for the kids who didn't know any better.