4 ms·
> A touch screen looks amazing and so futuristic Not true. If you examine sci-fi movies from the 1960s onwards, you'll learn that the most futuristic-looking i
by copperx 4y ago
> A touch screen looks amazing and so futuristic
Not true. If you examine sci-fi movies from the 1960s onwards, you'll learn that the most futuristic-looking interfaces have the most buttons and physical affordances. Touchscreens were never regarded as futuristic, and thus rarely depicted in sci-fi.
- wyre 4y agoI remember seeing touch screens in sci-fi when the touchscreen is a large table or when the touchscreen is being projected into air.
- squarefoot 4y agoThat could be because filmmakers didn't know about their existence. SciFi predicts a lot but also borrows from current knowledge; for example, we've seen black holes depicted in different ways according to the knowledge of the time of the writing/filming. Also, for many years before touch screens became reality the only known direct interaction with a screen was like a light pen, whose operation was slow and clumsy (can't "push" more than a "button" at the same time, wires, etc) which could have discouraged the idea suggesting to wait until the idea of operating screens directly using hands was conceived and became popular; probably in ST TNG LCARS interface. https://www.cygnus-x1.net/links/lcars/epics/TNG-S4/S4E3/TNG-S4E3-65.jpg https://www.cygnus-x1.net/links/lcars/epics/TNG-S4/S4E3/TNG-...