3 ms·
The Supreme Court can just ignore its own precedents, so this doesn’t really help.
by 31835843 4y ago
The Supreme Court can just ignore its own precedents, so this doesn’t really help.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> Supreme Court can just ignore its own precedents I’m not a fan of the current Court, but stare decisis has never been binding. Landmark rulings are landmarks because the create or break precedent. Courts have been doing that since there were courts.
- camgunz 4y agoStare decides bound Casey, at least. It's never before been ignored when it established a new individual right (Dobbs overturns precedent to remove a right, which has never been done before). This really can't be minimized as "Courts gonna Court".