4 ms·
> it doesn't seem to be capturing depth axis vibrations Good point, the paper mentions x-axis and y-axis, but doesn't mention z-axis. Maybe depth vibrations co
by infogulch 4y ago
> it doesn't seem to be capturing depth axis vibrations
Good point, the paper mentions x-axis and y-axis, but doesn't mention z-axis. Maybe depth vibrations could be resolved as changes to the interference pattern?
- pbhjpbhj 4y agoDo human ears resolve sound in more than one dimension? I've always considered that, per ear, we only get a sequence of compressions and rarefactions on the ear drum, that other aspects of hearing are through combination or 'cheating' (skin sensitivity and such). So, would it matter?
- infogulch 4y agoNo, but a thing vibrating in any dimension will still produce sound waves.
- taeric 4y agoYou can pinpoint with your two ears where sound is coming from, fairly well. Takes some training, of course. That said, I get the impression this is more complicated than the autocorrelation of multiple sensors?
- kimburgess 4y agoThere’s binaural localisation from phase and amplitude differences, but importantly also monoaural cues from frequency response. Your pinna act as a set of directional filters - which is part of why some binaural recordings can quite literally feel as though they’re in your head. What’s interesting with this is that while you can’t get those directional filters, you could use a system like this to provide 3 or more ‘sensors’ (eg the chip packet demo) within a scene and isolate signals the same way as an array mic.