5 ms·
> Except that (virtually) nobody on the right truly believes that it's full fledged baby murder Why would you think that? Clearly almost everyone that is again
by Grustaf 4y ago
> Except that (virtually) nobody on the right truly believes that it's full fledged baby murder
Why would you think that? Clearly almost everyone that is against abortion believes that, that's the whole point.
Even most people who are in favour of abortion would consider it at least close to murder if say an abusive husband beats his pregnant wife, killing the baby.
The only difference there is that the mother wanted the child to live, how can that have bearing on whether it's murder or not?
- orwin 4y agohttps://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-05-17-mn-58803-story.html https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-05-17-mn-58803-... It's not as clear as you seem to think. I would agree with the second court here. Prior to 25weeks this shouldn't be a murder. But if the action have an effect on the woman ability to bear children in the future, this should be considered as aggravating circumstances. And there is no case of abusing husbands causing miscarriage in the US. Even though i found study citing that 27% of miscarriage are caused by wife beaters in india, i couldn't find the statistics or any case in the US.
- Grustaf 4y agoI'm saying "most people consider", I am not talking about legal rulings.