Does a similar high resolution image of the same region before date of impact exist? If so it would significantly strengthen the claim that both craters are due

Does a similar high resolution image of the same region before date of impact exist? If so it would significantly strengthen the claim that both craters are due to the same recent impact. Looking at the density of craters how can we exclude the possibility that one of the craters simply existed before the new one? What alternative scenarios have been considered and ruled out? It would be nice to see what other explanations were considered but ruled out, and how it was ruled out. For example, did the object hit a lava tunnel? (I don't think so, nor do I see how it could explain a double crater, but I would like to see the thought processes of elimination of hypotheses). If the conclusion is correct, what was the second mass on the opposite end of the rocket motor? Is it some taboo failed project? A "stillborn" crew capsule? EDIT: the linked references actually show before and after images: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2022/nasas-lunar-reconnaissance-orbiter-spots-rocket-impact-site-on-moon https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2022/nasas-lunar-reconn...