4 ms·

I watched season 1 and 2. It is only Star Trek in name and not in spirit.

• KerrAvon 4y ago
  You stopped just as it was getting good. Season 1 was bad. Season 2 was a bit better. Season 3 was pretty good. Season 4 is boring and poorly paced.
  • rainwolf 4y ago
    The plot of season 4 reminded me a little too much of "Orphans of the helix"
  • izzydata 4y ago
    Perhaps, but I saw no reason for it to be named Star Trek. They should have named it anything else and I'd probably have enjoyed it more.
  • cassianoleal 4y ago
    I've found it consistently bad all the way. It did look like it was going to get a bit better when S3 started but it's still a lot of moping and crying and even the ship's AI having existential issues and zero exploration and socio-politics. Even the most high profile representatives of the different peoples are just a bunch of emotionally immature and persistently frightened individuals.
• tjpnz 4y ago
  They should just rename it to The Michael Burnham Show at this point.
  • TMWNN 4y ago
    I've not seen the show, but have heard that Burnham is basically the Mary Sue of all Mary Sues.
    • dariusj18 4y ago
      So much moral inconsistency
      • TMWNN 4y ago
        ?
        • dariusj18 4y ago
          Burnham is a terrible officer, but also always trying to talk up Starfleet as if she isn't constantly acting like Starfleet doesn't know what the fuck it's doing.
    • ASalazarMX 4y ago
      She's the protagonist, all the show is about her. I suspect it's intentionally a divisive character, to form a small but hard fanbase at the cost of losing the rest. Demagogues follow the same formula, it's kinda interesting to see it applied on a TV show.
• aruanavekar 4y ago