3 ms·
Rust actually does a (marginally) better job of being a low-level, almost portable assembler kind of language than C does. This isn't even really about things l
by jcranmer 4y ago
Rust actually does a (marginally) better job of being a low-level, almost portable assembler kind of language than C does. This isn't even really about things like undefined behavior (of which Rust still has quite a profusion), but in things like being able to actually pun types.
Additionally, Rust is a newer language that has incorporated some of the past 50 years of programming language design lessons that C has not incorporated (and likely never will).
- sdfhdhjdw3 4y agoThis is not a bad answer.